Catalogus
Volledige afbeeldingen bekijken — gratis registratie
Doorgaan met Google — het is gratis
of registreer met e-mail
Waarom registreren? Alleen om bots buiten ons catalogus te houden. Uw e-mail blijft privé — we delen het nooit en sturen u niets zonder uw toestemming. Dat garanderen wij u!
Obol
| Uitgever | Uncertain Cilician city |
|---|---|
| Jaar | 370 BC - 334 BC |
| Type | Log in om details te zien |
| Waarde | Obol (⅙) |
| Valuta | Log in om details te zien |
| Samenstelling | Log in om details te zien |
| Gewicht | Log in om details te zien |
| Diameter | Log in om details te zien |
| Dikte | Log in om details te zien |
| Vorm | Log in om details te zien |
| Techniek | Log in om details te zien |
| Oriëntatie | Log in om details te zien |
| Graveur(s) | Log in om details te zien |
| In omloop tot | Log in om details te zien |
| Referentie(s) | Log in om details te zien |
| Beschrijving voorzijde | Laureate head of Zeus facing left, rendered in archaic-influenced style characteristic of fourth-century Cilician coinage. The mature, bearded visage displays finely detailed wavy locks of hair and beard radiating from the face, with the laurel wreath rendered as a broad, leafy spray across the crown. The die engraving exhibits the bold, slightly schematic modeling typical of minor silver denominations from the Cilician satrapies. The field is plain, with no inscriptions or additional devices. The flan is irregular, consistent with the hand-struck production methods of the period. |
|---|---|
| Schrift voorzijde | Log in om details te zien |
| Opschrift voorzijde | Log in om details te zien |
| Beschrijving keerzijde | Log in om details te zien |
| Schrift keerzijde | Log in om details te zien |
| Opschrift keerzijde | Log in om details te zien |
| Rand | Log in om details te zien |
| Muntplaats | Log in om details te zien |
| Oplage | ND (370 BC - 334 BC) |
| Aanvullende informatie |
Cilicia in this period was a patchwork of semi-autonomous cities and dynasts operating under loose Achaemenid suzerainty, which is precisely why attribution remains contested — local mint authority was real but poorly documented, and the surviving epigraphic record is thin. The SNG references place this piece within a recognized typological group without committing to a specific issuer, a common and honest position for this region's fractional silver.