Catalogus
Volledige afbeeldingen bekijken — gratis registratie
Doorgaan met Google — het is gratis
of registreer met e-mail
Waarom registreren? Alleen om bots buiten ons catalogus te houden. Uw e-mail blijft privé — we delen het nooit en sturen u niets zonder uw toestemming. Dat garanderen wij u!
Dirham 'Ornamental type' - anepigraphic Bulghar mint
| Uitgever | Golden Horde |
|---|---|
| Jaar | 1280-1310 |
| Type | Log in om details te zien |
| Waarde | Log in om details te zien |
| Valuta | Log in om details te zien |
| Samenstelling | Log in om details te zien |
| Gewicht | 1.27 g |
| Diameter | Log in om details te zien |
| Dikte | Log in om details te zien |
| Vorm | Log in om details te zien |
| Techniek | Log in om details te zien |
| Oriëntatie | Log in om details te zien |
| Graveur(s) | Log in om details te zien |
| In omloop tot | Log in om details te zien |
| Referentie(s) | Log in om details te zien |
| Beschrijving voorzijde | Central field occupied by a stylized Golden Horde tamga device, rendered in low relief with characteristic trident-like form. The tamga is surrounded by a scattered arrangement of raised pellets distributed across the flat, unbordered field. The entire design is contained within a plain incuse circle. The coin surface is irregular and slightly uneven, consistent with hand-hammered production. The type is fully anepigraphic, bearing no inscriptions or legends. |
|---|---|
| Schrift voorzijde | Log in om details te zien |
| Opschrift voorzijde | Log in om details te zien |
| Beschrijving keerzijde | Log in om details te zien |
| Schrift keerzijde | Log in om details te zien |
| Opschrift keerzijde | Log in om details te zien |
| Rand | Log in om details te zien |
| Muntplaats | Log in om details te zien |
| Oplage | ND (1280-1310) |
| Aanvullende informatie |
The anepigraphic Bulghar dirhams of the Golden Horde occupy a genuinely odd corner of Jochid numismatics. Struck at Bulghar — the most established mint in the western khanate — these pieces deliberately omit the ruler's name, making precise attribution to individual reigns within the 1280–1310 window a matter of ongoing scholarly dispute. Whether this reflects administrative disruption during the succession crises following Möngke Temür's death in 1280, or simply a localized minting convention, remains unresolved.
Sagdeeva's classification treats them as a coherent group rather than reign-specific issues.