See full images - free registration
Continue with Google - no registration! or register with email

Why register? Just to keep bots out of our catalog. Your email stays private - we will never share it or send you anything uninvited. We guarantee you that!

Dirham 'Ornamental type' - anepigraphic Bulghar mint

Issuer Golden Horde
Year 1280-1310
Type Log in to see details
Value Log in to see details
Currency Log in to see details
Composition Log in to see details
Weight 1.3 g
Diameter Log in to see details
Thickness Log in to see details
Shape Log in to see details
Technique Log in to see details
Orientation Log in to see details
Engraver(s) Log in to see details
In circulation to Log in to see details
Reference(s) Log in to see details
Obverse description Log in to see details
Obverse script Log in to see details
Obverse lettering Log in to see details
Reverse description Anepigraphic field featuring a prominent eight-pointed star or wheel motif at center, formed by radiating spokes emanating from a central pellet, each spoke terminating in a small globule. Additional pellets are scattered about the field in a decorative arrangement, particularly in the lower portion. The design is boldly struck in low relief on an irregularly shaped flan typical of Golden Horde hammered silver. No inscriptions or legends are present, consistent with the ornamental type classification for this Bulghar issue.
Reverse script Log in to see details
Reverse lettering Log in to see details
Edge Log in to see details
Mint Bulghar
Mintage Log in to see details
Additional information

The anepigraphic "ornamental" dirhams of the Bulghar mint present one of the more puzzling episodes in Golden Horde numismatics. Bulghar — the old Volga Bulgarian capital on the Kama-Volga confluence — functioned as the primary northern mint of the Horde, and these pieces were struck during a period of administrative turbulence following the reign of Möngke Temür, when central authority over provincial minting was inconsistent enough to permit issues carrying no inscriptions at all.

Whether the absence of epigraphic content reflects a deliberate local convention, a transitional administrative gap, or simply an unresolved attribution problem among the cataloguers remains debated. Sagdeeva's sequencing places them between identifiable reign issues without committing to a specific khan.

YOU MAY ALSO LIKE