Catalogue
| Émetteur | Amisos |
|---|---|
| Année | 95 BC - 70 BC |
| Type | Standard circulation coin |
| Valeur | Dichalkon (1⁄24) |
| Devise | Drachm |
| Composition | Bronze |
| Poids | 3.5 g |
| Diamètre | 16 mm |
| Épaisseur | |
| Forme | Round (irregular) |
| Technique | Hammered |
| Orientation | Variable alignment ↺ |
| Graveur(s) | |
| En circulation jusqu’à | |
| Référence(s) | Sea#1142-1143 7#250 |
| Description de l’avers | Head of winged Eros, right. |
|---|---|
| Écriture de l’avers | |
| Légende de l’avers | |
| Description du revers | Quiver and unstrung bow. |
| Écriture du revers | Greek |
| Légende du revers |
ΑΜΙ ΣΟΥ (Translation: Amisos) |
| Tranche | |
| Atelier | |
| Tirage |
ND (95 BC - 70 BC) - - |
| ID Numisquare | 6452666740 |
| Informations supplémentaires |
Historical Context: This Dichalkon from Amisos, dated 95-70 BC, belongs to the extensive coinage of Mithridates VI Eupator, King of Pontus. This period marks the height of his power and his protracted Mithridatic Wars against the Roman Republic. Amisos, a crucial Black Sea port, was a vital economic and strategic center within Mithridates' Hellenistic empire. The issuance of such bronze denominations reflects the widespread commercial activity and practical monetary needs of a kingdom engaged in significant military and administrative undertakings.
Artistry: Though engravers are anonymous, the coin adheres to the Hellenistic stylistic tradition of Pontic royal issues. The obverse typically features a robust portrait, often a deity like Dionysus or Zeus, or a heroic kingly depiction, rendered with classical influences and dynamic energy. The reverse frequently displays an eagle, a star-and-crescent motif, or another symbol associated with Pontic royalty or local cults. This artistic program served both practical monetary functions and propaganda, asserting Mithridates' divine favor and imperial ambitions.
Technical/Grading: Struck on a bronze flan (3.5 grams, 16 millimeters), this Dichalkon is a common small denomination. Key high-points—hair, nose, chin on a portrait, or breast and wings on an eagle—are prone to wear. Technical strike quality varies; off-center strikes, minor flan irregularities, and inconsistent pressure leading to flatness are common. Collectors assess detail preservation, patina quality, and overall flan integrity, as corrosion is a frequent concern for ancient bronzes.