کاتالوگ
| صادرکننده | Amisos |
|---|---|
| سال | 95 BC - 70 BC |
| نوع | Standard circulation coin |
| ارزش | Dichalkon (1⁄24) |
| واحد پول | Drachm |
| ترکیب | Bronze |
| وزن | 3.5 g |
| قطر | 16 mm |
| ضخامت | |
| شکل | Round (irregular) |
| تکنیک | Hammered |
| جهت | Variable alignment ↺ |
| حکاک(ها) | |
| در گردش تا | |
| مرجع(ها) | Sea#1142-1143 7#250 |
| توضیحات روی سکه | Head of winged Eros, right. |
|---|---|
| خط روی سکه | |
| نوشتههای روی سکه | |
| توضیحات پشت سکه | Quiver and unstrung bow. |
| خط پشت سکه | Greek |
| نوشتههای پشت سکه |
ΑΜΙ ΣΟΥ (Translation: Amisos) |
| لبه | |
| ضرابخانه | |
| تیراژ ضرب |
ND (95 BC - 70 BC) - - |
| شناسه Numisquare | 6452666740 |
| اطلاعات تکمیلی |
Historical Context: This Dichalkon from Amisos, dated 95-70 BC, belongs to the extensive coinage of Mithridates VI Eupator, King of Pontus. This period marks the height of his power and his protracted Mithridatic Wars against the Roman Republic. Amisos, a crucial Black Sea port, was a vital economic and strategic center within Mithridates' Hellenistic empire. The issuance of such bronze denominations reflects the widespread commercial activity and practical monetary needs of a kingdom engaged in significant military and administrative undertakings.
Artistry: Though engravers are anonymous, the coin adheres to the Hellenistic stylistic tradition of Pontic royal issues. The obverse typically features a robust portrait, often a deity like Dionysus or Zeus, or a heroic kingly depiction, rendered with classical influences and dynamic energy. The reverse frequently displays an eagle, a star-and-crescent motif, or another symbol associated with Pontic royalty or local cults. This artistic program served both practical monetary functions and propaganda, asserting Mithridates' divine favor and imperial ambitions.
Technical/Grading: Struck on a bronze flan (3.5 grams, 16 millimeters), this Dichalkon is a common small denomination. Key high-points—hair, nose, chin on a portrait, or breast and wings on an eagle—are prone to wear. Technical strike quality varies; off-center strikes, minor flan irregularities, and inconsistent pressure leading to flatness are common. Collectors assess detail preservation, patina quality, and overall flan integrity, as corrosion is a frequent concern for ancient bronzes.