Dichalkon - Mithridates VI

İhraççı Amisos
Yıl 95 BC - 70 BC
Tür Standard circulation coin
Değer Dichalkon (1⁄24)
Para birimi Drachm
Bileşim Bronze
Ağırlık 3.5 g
Çap 16 mm
Kalınlık
Şekil Round (irregular)
Teknik Hammered
Yönlendirme Variable alignment ↺
Gravürcü(ler)
Dolaşımda olduğu yıl
Referans(lar) Sea#1142-1143 7#250
Ön yüz açıklaması Head of winged Eros, right.
Ön yüz yazısı
Ön yüz lejandı
Arka yüz açıklaması Quiver and unstrung bow.
Arka yüz yazısı Greek
Arka yüz lejandı ΑΜΙ ΣΟΥ
(Translation: Amisos)
Kenar
Darphane
Basma adedi ND (95 BC - 70 BC) - -
Numisquare Kimliği 6452666740
Ek bilgiler

Historical Context: This Dichalkon from Amisos, dated 95-70 BC, belongs to the extensive coinage of Mithridates VI Eupator, King of Pontus. This period marks the height of his power and his protracted Mithridatic Wars against the Roman Republic. Amisos, a crucial Black Sea port, was a vital economic and strategic center within Mithridates' Hellenistic empire. The issuance of such bronze denominations reflects the widespread commercial activity and practical monetary needs of a kingdom engaged in significant military and administrative undertakings.

Artistry: Though engravers are anonymous, the coin adheres to the Hellenistic stylistic tradition of Pontic royal issues. The obverse typically features a robust portrait, often a deity like Dionysus or Zeus, or a heroic kingly depiction, rendered with classical influences and dynamic energy. The reverse frequently displays an eagle, a star-and-crescent motif, or another symbol associated with Pontic royalty or local cults. This artistic program served both practical monetary functions and propaganda, asserting Mithridates' divine favor and imperial ambitions.

Technical/Grading: Struck on a bronze flan (3.5 grams, 16 millimeters), this Dichalkon is a common small denomination. Key high-points—hair, nose, chin on a portrait, or breast and wings on an eagle—are prone to wear. Technical strike quality varies; off-center strikes, minor flan irregularities, and inconsistent pressure leading to flatness are common. Collectors assess detail preservation, patina quality, and overall flan integrity, as corrosion is a frequent concern for ancient bronzes.

×