目录
| 发行方 | Tegea (Arkadia) |
|---|---|
| 年份 | 423 BC - 400 BC |
| 类型 | Standard circulation coin |
| 面值 | Dichalkon (1⁄24) |
| 货币 | Drachm |
| 材质 | Bronze |
| 重量 | 3.21 g |
| 直径 | 16 mm |
| 厚度 | |
| 形状 | Round (irregular) |
| 制作工艺 | Hammered |
| 方向 | Variable alignment ↺ |
| 雕刻师 | |
| 流通至 | |
| 参考资料 | Peloponnesos#1722 , SNG Copenhagen#292 , Traité III#980 , HGC 5#1057 , Winterthur 1#2254 |
| 正面描述 | Gorgoneion facing. |
|---|---|
| 正面文字 | |
| 正面铭文 | |
| 背面描述 | Owl three-quarter left. |
| 背面文字 | |
| 背面铭文 | |
| 边缘 | |
| 铸币厂 | |
| 铸造量 |
ND (423 BC - 400 BC) - - |
| Numisquare 编号 | 4612732480 |
| 附加信息 |
Historical Context: This Dichalkon was issued by Tegea, a prominent Arcadian city, during the turbulent period of 423-400 BC, encompassing the latter stages and immediate aftermath of the Peloponnesian War. Tegea, often a staunch Spartan ally, maintained civic autonomy, including the right to mint coinage. The production of bronze currency, distinct from silver, highlights a focus on local circulation and smaller transactions, vital for daily commerce amidst the significant political and military upheavals affecting the Peloponnesos.
Artistry: While the specific engraver remains anonymous, typical for city-state bronzes, the coin reflects the robust, late Classical stylistic school. Tegean coinage frequently featured local deities or heroes. The obverse likely presented a deity head, such as Athena Alea or Herakles, rendered with a sturdy, stylized realism characteristic of bronze issues. The reverse would typically display an emblem or the city ethnic, executed with clarity, emphasizing legibility and local identity over intricate detail.
Technical/Grading: This Dichalkon, weighing 3.21 grams and measuring 16 millimeters, represents a standard bronze issue. Key high-points for evaluation include the highest relief areas on the obverse portrait, such as hair or facial contours, and central elements of the reverse device. Technical strike quality is paramount; well-centered strikes with full detail on main devices are highly prized. Bronze flans were often less perfectly prepared, so a round, well-struck example is desirable. Surface preservation, including a stable, attractive patina and minimal corrosion, significantly impacts its numismatic grade.