Каталог
| Эмитент | Tegea (Arkadia) |
|---|---|
| Год | 423 BC - 400 BC |
| Тип | Standard circulation coin |
| Номинал | Dichalkon (1⁄24) |
| Валюта | Drachm |
| Состав | Bronze |
| Вес | 3.21 g |
| Диаметр | 16 mm |
| Толщина | |
| Форма | Round (irregular) |
| Техника | Hammered |
| Ориентация | Variable alignment ↺ |
| Гравёр(ы) | |
| В обращении до | |
| Каталожные номера | Peloponnesos#1722 , SNG Copenhagen#292 , Traité III#980 , HGC 5#1057 , Winterthur 1#2254 |
| Описание аверса | Gorgoneion facing. |
|---|---|
| Письменность аверса | |
| Надписи аверса | |
| Описание реверса | Owl three-quarter left. |
| Письменность реверса | |
| Надписи реверса | |
| Гурт | |
| Монетный двор | |
| Тираж |
ND (423 BC - 400 BC) - - |
| ID Numisquare | 4612732480 |
| Дополнительная информация |
Historical Context: This Dichalkon was issued by Tegea, a prominent Arcadian city, during the turbulent period of 423-400 BC, encompassing the latter stages and immediate aftermath of the Peloponnesian War. Tegea, often a staunch Spartan ally, maintained civic autonomy, including the right to mint coinage. The production of bronze currency, distinct from silver, highlights a focus on local circulation and smaller transactions, vital for daily commerce amidst the significant political and military upheavals affecting the Peloponnesos.
Artistry: While the specific engraver remains anonymous, typical for city-state bronzes, the coin reflects the robust, late Classical stylistic school. Tegean coinage frequently featured local deities or heroes. The obverse likely presented a deity head, such as Athena Alea or Herakles, rendered with a sturdy, stylized realism characteristic of bronze issues. The reverse would typically display an emblem or the city ethnic, executed with clarity, emphasizing legibility and local identity over intricate detail.
Technical/Grading: This Dichalkon, weighing 3.21 grams and measuring 16 millimeters, represents a standard bronze issue. Key high-points for evaluation include the highest relief areas on the obverse portrait, such as hair or facial contours, and central elements of the reverse device. Technical strike quality is paramount; well-centered strikes with full detail on main devices are highly prized. Bronze flans were often less perfectly prepared, so a round, well-struck example is desirable. Surface preservation, including a stable, attractive patina and minimal corrosion, significantly impacts its numismatic grade.