Katalog
| İhraççı | Tegea (Arkadia) |
|---|---|
| Yıl | 423 BC - 400 BC |
| Tür | Standard circulation coin |
| Değer | Dichalkon (1⁄24) |
| Para birimi | Drachm |
| Bileşim | Bronze |
| Ağırlık | 3.21 g |
| Çap | 16 mm |
| Kalınlık | |
| Şekil | Round (irregular) |
| Teknik | Hammered |
| Yönlendirme | Variable alignment ↺ |
| Gravürcü(ler) | |
| Dolaşımda olduğu yıl | |
| Referans(lar) | Peloponnesos#1722 , SNG Copenhagen#292 , Traité III#980 , HGC 5#1057 , Winterthur 1#2254 |
| Ön yüz açıklaması | Gorgoneion facing. |
|---|---|
| Ön yüz yazısı | |
| Ön yüz lejandı | |
| Arka yüz açıklaması | Owl three-quarter left. |
| Arka yüz yazısı | |
| Arka yüz lejandı | |
| Kenar | |
| Darphane | |
| Basma adedi |
ND (423 BC - 400 BC) - - |
| Numisquare Kimliği | 4612732480 |
| Ek bilgiler |
Historical Context: This Dichalkon was issued by Tegea, a prominent Arcadian city, during the turbulent period of 423-400 BC, encompassing the latter stages and immediate aftermath of the Peloponnesian War. Tegea, often a staunch Spartan ally, maintained civic autonomy, including the right to mint coinage. The production of bronze currency, distinct from silver, highlights a focus on local circulation and smaller transactions, vital for daily commerce amidst the significant political and military upheavals affecting the Peloponnesos.
Artistry: While the specific engraver remains anonymous, typical for city-state bronzes, the coin reflects the robust, late Classical stylistic school. Tegean coinage frequently featured local deities or heroes. The obverse likely presented a deity head, such as Athena Alea or Herakles, rendered with a sturdy, stylized realism characteristic of bronze issues. The reverse would typically display an emblem or the city ethnic, executed with clarity, emphasizing legibility and local identity over intricate detail.
Technical/Grading: This Dichalkon, weighing 3.21 grams and measuring 16 millimeters, represents a standard bronze issue. Key high-points for evaluation include the highest relief areas on the obverse portrait, such as hair or facial contours, and central elements of the reverse device. Technical strike quality is paramount; well-centered strikes with full detail on main devices are highly prized. Bronze flans were often less perfectly prepared, so a round, well-struck example is desirable. Surface preservation, including a stable, attractive patina and minimal corrosion, significantly impacts its numismatic grade.