Volledige afbeeldingen bekijken — gratis registratie
Doorgaan met Google — het is gratis of registreer met e-mail

Waarom registreren? Alleen om bots buiten ons catalogus te houden. Uw e-mail blijft privé — we delen het nooit en sturen u niets zonder uw toestemming. Dat garanderen wij u!

Denier - Henry II Esslingen mint

Uitgever Holy Roman Empire
Jaar 1002-1024
Type Log in om details te zien
Waarde Log in om details te zien
Valuta Log in om details te zien
Samenstelling Log in om details te zien
Gewicht 1.05 g
Diameter Log in om details te zien
Dikte Log in om details te zien
Vorm Log in om details te zien
Techniek Log in om details te zien
Oriëntatie Log in om details te zien
Graveur(s) Log in om details te zien
In omloop tot Log in om details te zien
Referentie(s) Log in om details te zien
Beschrijving voorzijde Facing bust of Emperor Henry II in high relief, rendered in the schematic Ottonian style characteristic of early medieval hammered coinage. The ruler is depicted wearing a crown or diadem adorned with pellets and stylized ornamental elements, with coarsely engraved facial features including almond-shaped eyes and a broad nose. The bust is surrounded by a beaded or dotted inner border. The surrounding field bears the Latin legend +HEINRICVS, identifying the emperor. The flan is irregular in shape, typical of hand-struck silver pfennigs of the period.
Schrift voorzijde Log in om details te zien
Opschrift voorzijde Log in om details te zien
Beschrijving keerzijde Log in om details te zien
Schrift keerzijde Latin
Opschrift keerzijde Log in om details te zien
Rand Log in om details te zien
Muntplaats Log in om details te zien
Oplage Log in om details te zien
Aanvullende informatie

Henry II was the last ruler of the Ottonian dynasty, and his reign saw the imperial mints operating under a decentralized system that granted ecclesiastical and secular lords broad coining rights. Esslingen, situated on the Neckar, functioned as an active royal mint under Henry — one of several Swabian sites producing deniers during this period. The KR#4 attribution and the Kluge Kar#84 reference place this firmly within the documented royal issues rather than the lookalike episcopal imitations that plague attribution of Ottonian deniers from this region.

MISSCHIEN OOK INTERESSANT