Catalogus
| Uitgever | Lower Lusatia, Margravate of |
|---|---|
| Jaar | |
| Type | Standard circulation coin |
| Waarde | Log in om details te zien |
| Valuta | Log in om details te zien |
| Samenstelling | Log in om details te zien |
| Gewicht | Log in om details te zien |
| Diameter | Log in om details te zien |
| Dikte | Log in om details te zien |
| Vorm | Log in om details te zien |
| Techniek | Log in om details te zien |
| Oriëntatie | Log in om details te zien |
| Graveur(s) | Log in om details te zien |
| In omloop tot | Log in om details te zien |
| Referentie(s) | Log in om details te zien |
| Beschrijving voorzijde | Central design depicting a stylized helmet surmounted by a prominent spread of deer antlers, rendered in bold relief characteristic of the bracteate tradition. The helmet form is rendered frontally, with the branching antlers extending symmetrically to either side and upward, filling the field. The design is enclosed within a plain raised border ring, with the coin's irregular scalloped edge visible at the periphery. The overall composition is deeply struck in a single-sided bracteate technique, producing a convex relief on the obverse and a corresponding incuse impression. |
|---|---|
| Schrift voorzijde | Log in om details te zien |
| Opschrift voorzijde | Log in om details te zien |
| Beschrijving keerzijde | Blank, as is standard for bracteate coinage, with only the incuse mirror image of the obverse design faintly visible as a natural consequence of the single-die bracteate striking technique. |
| Schrift keerzijde | Log in om details te zien |
| Opschrift keerzijde | Log in om details te zien |
| Rand | Log in om details te zien |
| Muntplaats | Log in om details te zien |
| Oplage | Log in om details te zien |
| Aanvullende informatie |
Lower Lusatia's bracteate deniers were struck at a time when the margravate changed hands repeatedly between Ascanian, Bohemian, and eventually Luxembourgian overlords — political instability that fragmented local coinage production and left attribution of individual dies genuinely contested among specialists. Berger 1925 sits within a group whose precise mint assignment remains unresolved.