Vollständige Bilder anzeigen — kostenlose Registrierung
Mit Google fortfahren — kostenlos oder mit E-Mail registrieren

Denier Bracteate

Emittent Lower Lusatia, Margravate of
Jahr
Typ Standard circulation coin
Nennwert Anmelden um Details zu sehen
Währung Anmelden um Details zu sehen
Material Anmelden um Details zu sehen
Gewicht Anmelden um Details zu sehen
Durchmesser Anmelden um Details zu sehen
Dicke Anmelden um Details zu sehen
Form Anmelden um Details zu sehen
Prägetechnik Anmelden um Details zu sehen
Ausrichtung Anmelden um Details zu sehen
Stempelschneider Anmelden um Details zu sehen
Im Umlauf bis Anmelden um Details zu sehen
Referenz(en) Anmelden um Details zu sehen
Aversbeschreibung Central design depicting a stylized helmet surmounted by a prominent spread of deer antlers, rendered in bold relief characteristic of the bracteate tradition. The helmet form is rendered frontally, with the branching antlers extending symmetrically to either side and upward, filling the field. The design is enclosed within a plain raised border ring, with the coin's irregular scalloped edge visible at the periphery. The overall composition is deeply struck in a single-sided bracteate technique, producing a convex relief on the obverse and a corresponding incuse impression.
Aversschrift Anmelden um Details zu sehen
Averslegende Anmelden um Details zu sehen
Reversbeschreibung Blank, as is standard for bracteate coinage, with only the incuse mirror image of the obverse design faintly visible as a natural consequence of the single-die bracteate striking technique.
Reversschrift Anmelden um Details zu sehen
Reverslegende Anmelden um Details zu sehen
Rand Anmelden um Details zu sehen
Prägestätte Anmelden um Details zu sehen
Auflage Anmelden um Details zu sehen
Zusätzliche Informationen

Lower Lusatia's bracteate deniers were struck at a time when the margravate changed hands repeatedly between Ascanian, Bohemian, and eventually Luxembourgian overlords — political instability that fragmented local coinage production and left attribution of individual dies genuinely contested among specialists. Berger 1925 sits within a group whose precise mint assignment remains unresolved.