Catalog
See full images - free registration
Continue with Google - no registration!
or register with email
Why register? Just to keep bots out of our catalog. Your email stays private - we will never share it or send you anything uninvited. We guarantee you that!
Denier anonymous
| Issuer | Vendôme, County of |
|---|---|
| Year | 940-950 |
| Type | Standard circulation coin |
| Value | Log in to see details |
| Currency | Log in to see details |
| Composition | Log in to see details |
| Weight | Log in to see details |
| Diameter | Log in to see details |
| Thickness | Log in to see details |
| Shape | Log in to see details |
| Technique | Log in to see details |
| Orientation | Log in to see details |
| Engraver(s) | Log in to see details |
| In circulation to | Log in to see details |
| Reference(s) | Log in to see details |
| Obverse description | Crude effigy in profile facing right, rendered in the degenerate Carolingian style typical of mid-10th-century feudal deniers. The bust is schematically executed with rudimentary facial features indicated by pellets and incised lines, surmounted by what appears to be a diadem or crown. The field is populated with scattered pellets, and the overall design reflects the progressive stylization characteristic of anonymous feudal coinage from the Loire valley. A beaded or toothed border frames the design at the periphery. |
|---|---|
| Obverse script | Log in to see details |
| Obverse lettering | Log in to see details |
| Reverse description | Log in to see details |
| Reverse script | Log in to see details |
| Reverse lettering | Log in to see details |
| Edge | Log in to see details |
| Mint | Vendôme |
| Mintage | Log in to see details |
| Additional information |
Vendôme's anonymous deniers of the mid-tenth century predate the county's absorption into the orbit of the Capetian dynasty by several generations, issued at a moment when local lords across the former Carolingian heartland were asserting independent minting rights almost by default — central authority had simply collapsed too thoroughly to contest them. The "anonymous" attribution reflects not anonymity in the modern sense but a deliberate omission of any count's name, a practice that may have been intended to invoke Carolingian continuity rather than personal lordly authority.