Catalogus
| Uitgever | Bishopric of Merseburg |
|---|---|
| Jaar | 1000 |
| Type | Log in om details te zien |
| Waarde | 1 Pfennig |
| Valuta | Log in om details te zien |
| Samenstelling | Log in om details te zien |
| Gewicht | Log in om details te zien |
| Diameter | Log in om details te zien |
| Dikte | Log in om details te zien |
| Vorm | Log in om details te zien |
| Techniek | Log in om details te zien |
| Oriëntatie | Log in om details te zien |
| Graveur(s) | Log in om details te zien |
| In omloop tot | Log in om details te zien |
| Referentie(s) | Log in om details te zien |
| Beschrijving voorzijde | Log in om details te zien |
|---|---|
| Schrift voorzijde | Log in om details te zien |
| Opschrift voorzijde | Log in om details te zien |
| Beschrijving keerzijde | A four-petalled cloverleaf or cross-fourchée motif is centrally positioned within the field, its rounded lobes forming a quatrefoil arrangement suggestive of a stylized cross. The design is enclosed within a beaded inner circle, itself surrounded by a plain outer rim. Faint traces of a degenerate or pseudo-legend may be present around the inner circle, consistent with anonymous episcopal bracteate-related coinage of the period. The reverse displays the typical flat, lightly struck character of early medieval German hammered silver. |
| Schrift keerzijde | Log in om details te zien |
| Opschrift keerzijde | Log in om details te zien |
| Rand | Log in om details te zien |
| Muntplaats | Log in om details te zien |
| Oplage | 1000: ND (1000) |
| Aanvullende informatie |
The Bishopric of Merseburg had an unusual institutional history: it was dissolved in 973 by Otto II, who redistributed its territories to neighboring sees, then restored in 968 — sources conflict on the exact sequencing — before being definitively re-established in 981 under Bishop Giselher. Anonymous deniers of this period reflect precisely that administrative instability; episcopal minting authority was asserted and reasserted as each restoration required fresh demonstration of ecclesiastical privilege. The absence of a named bishop on this issue is not an anomaly but a deliberate convention common to Ottonian episcopal minting, where the see itself, rather than its incumbent, held the coinage right.