Katalog
| Emittent | Bishopric of Merseburg |
|---|---|
| Jahr | 1000 |
| Typ | Anmelden um Details zu sehen |
| Nennwert | 1 Pfennig |
| Währung | Anmelden um Details zu sehen |
| Material | Anmelden um Details zu sehen |
| Gewicht | Anmelden um Details zu sehen |
| Durchmesser | Anmelden um Details zu sehen |
| Dicke | Anmelden um Details zu sehen |
| Form | Anmelden um Details zu sehen |
| Prägetechnik | Anmelden um Details zu sehen |
| Ausrichtung | Anmelden um Details zu sehen |
| Stempelschneider | Anmelden um Details zu sehen |
| Im Umlauf bis | Anmelden um Details zu sehen |
| Referenz(en) | Anmelden um Details zu sehen |
| Aversbeschreibung | Anmelden um Details zu sehen |
|---|---|
| Aversschrift | Anmelden um Details zu sehen |
| Averslegende | Anmelden um Details zu sehen |
| Reversbeschreibung | A four-petalled cloverleaf or cross-fourchée motif is centrally positioned within the field, its rounded lobes forming a quatrefoil arrangement suggestive of a stylized cross. The design is enclosed within a beaded inner circle, itself surrounded by a plain outer rim. Faint traces of a degenerate or pseudo-legend may be present around the inner circle, consistent with anonymous episcopal bracteate-related coinage of the period. The reverse displays the typical flat, lightly struck character of early medieval German hammered silver. |
| Reversschrift | Anmelden um Details zu sehen |
| Reverslegende | Anmelden um Details zu sehen |
| Rand | Anmelden um Details zu sehen |
| Prägestätte | Anmelden um Details zu sehen |
| Auflage | 1000: ND (1000) |
| Zusätzliche Informationen |
The Bishopric of Merseburg had an unusual institutional history: it was dissolved in 973 by Otto II, who redistributed its territories to neighboring sees, then restored in 968 — sources conflict on the exact sequencing — before being definitively re-established in 981 under Bishop Giselher. Anonymous deniers of this period reflect precisely that administrative instability; episcopal minting authority was asserted and reasserted as each restoration required fresh demonstration of ecclesiastical privilege. The absence of a named bishop on this issue is not an anomaly but a deliberate convention common to Ottonian episcopal minting, where the see itself, rather than its incumbent, held the coinage right.