Catalog
Why register? Just to keep bots out of our catalog. Your email stays private - we will never share it or send you anything uninvited. We guarantee you that!
| Issuer | Tribes in Jammu and Kashmir (Kidarite Kingdom) |
|---|---|
| Year | 600-700 |
| Type | Log in to see details |
| Value | Log in to see details |
| Currency | Log in to see details |
| Composition | Log in to see details |
| Weight | Log in to see details |
| Diameter | Log in to see details |
| Thickness | Log in to see details |
| Shape | Round (irregular) |
| Technique | Log in to see details |
| Orientation | Log in to see details |
| Engraver(s) | Log in to see details |
| In circulation to | Log in to see details |
| Reference(s) | Log in to see details |
| Obverse description | Log in to see details |
|---|---|
| Obverse script | Brahmi |
| Obverse lettering | Log in to see details |
| Reverse description | Log in to see details |
| Reverse script | Brahmi |
| Reverse lettering | Log in to see details |
| Edge | Log in to see details |
| Mint | Log in to see details |
| Mintage | Log in to see details |
| Additional information |
The Kidarite kingdom had effectively collapsed under Hephthalite pressure by the mid-5th century, but successor tribes in the northwestern subcontinent continued striking coinage that mimicked Kidarite types for generations — sometimes centuries — after the political entity that originated those designs had ceased to exist. The progressive debasement visible in this series is documentary evidence of fragmenting authority: each issuing group reduced metal quality incrementally, producing electrum where their predecessors had struck gold.
The "Namvihakya" attribution itself reflects unresolved scholarly debate. These issues remain poorly provenanced, and the Mitchiner reference carries a variant notation precisely because no two specimens appear to follow an identical die chain.