Catalog
See full images - free registration
Continue with Google - no registration!
or register with email
Why register? Just to keep bots out of our catalog. Your email stays private - we will never share it or send you anything uninvited. We guarantee you that!
Æ Fals - Anonymous Amir
| Issuer | Sind |
|---|---|
| Year | 854-1011 |
| Type | Log in to see details |
| Value | Log in to see details |
| Currency | Dirham (854-1011) |
| Composition | Log in to see details |
| Weight | Log in to see details |
| Diameter | Log in to see details |
| Thickness | Log in to see details |
| Shape | Log in to see details |
| Technique | Log in to see details |
| Orientation | Log in to see details |
| Engraver(s) | Log in to see details |
| In circulation to | Log in to see details |
| Reference(s) | Log in to see details |
| Obverse description | Crude, irregular hammered copper flan bearing a geometric field divided by diagonal cross-hatched incuse lines. Four or five raised pellets or bosses are distributed across the quadrants of the field, a decorative device characteristic of anonymous Sindi fulus of this period. The entire design is of a highly schematic and non-figural character, consistent with the aniconic tradition of Islamic coinage. No legible inscription or legend is present on this side. |
|---|---|
| Obverse script | Log in to see details |
| Obverse lettering | Log in to see details |
| Reverse description | Log in to see details |
| Reverse script | Log in to see details |
| Reverse lettering | Log in to see details |
| Edge | Log in to see details |
| Mint | Log in to see details |
| Mintage | ND (854-1011) |
| Additional information |
The anonymous amirs of Sind occupied a politically ambiguous position — nominally within the Abbasid orbit but increasingly autonomous as caliphal authority fragmented after Samarra. Copper fals of this region and period were purely local instruments, filling the gap left by the near-total absence of silver dirhams in everyday transactions across the lower Indus valley.
The omission of a ruler's name was not always modesty — it could reflect contested succession, short tenure, or deliberate distancing from Baghdad.