Catalogus
Volledige afbeeldingen bekijken — gratis registratie
Doorgaan met Google — het is gratis
of registreer met e-mail
Waarom registreren? Alleen om bots buiten ons catalogus te houden. Uw e-mail blijft privé — we delen het nooit en sturen u niets zonder uw toestemming. Dat garanderen wij u!
500 Dinars
| Uitgever | Central Bank of Iraq |
|---|---|
| Jaar | 2013 |
| Type | Log in om details te zien |
| Waarde | Log in om details te zien |
| Valuta | Log in om details te zien |
| Samenstelling | Log in om details te zien |
| Afmetingen | Log in om details te zien |
| Vorm | Log in om details te zien |
| Drukker | De La Rue Currency, Gateshead |
| Ontwerper(s) | Log in om details te zien |
| Graveur(s) | Log in om details te zien |
| In omloop tot | Log in om details te zien |
| Referentie(s) | Log in om details te zien |
| Beschrijving voorzijde | The central vignette presents the Dûkan Dam on the Al-Zab river, rendered in fine intaglio line work. Denomination numerals are placed in all four corners, with two tactile recognition circles positioned along the left edge to assist visually impaired users. |
|---|---|
| Opschrift voorzijde | Log in om details te zien |
| Beschrijving keerzijde | Log in om details te zien |
| Opschrift keerzijde | Central Bank of Iraq Five Hundred Dinars بنك المركزي العراقي خمسمائة دينار |
| Handtekening(en) | Log in om details te zien |
| Beveiligingstype | Log in om details te zien |
| Beschrijving beveiliging | Log in om details te zien |
| Varianten | Log in om details te zien |
| Opmerkingen |
The P#98 500 Dinars belongs to the post-2003 reconstruction series issued after the Coalition Provisional Authority oversaw the complete replacement of Iraq's Saddam-era currency. De La Rue's Gateshead facility — one of the firm's primary security printing sites in the UK — handled production, which was standard for this series given the volume and security requirements involved in re-establishing a functioning national currency after the 2003 invasion.
The "Printed: 30.04.1945" date in the catalog data is almost certainly a cataloging error and should be verified against the note's actual date of issue inscription.