Catalogus
Waarom registreren? Alleen om bots buiten ons catalogus te houden. Uw e-mail blijft privé — we delen het nooit en sturen u niets zonder uw toestemming. Dat garanderen wij u!
| Uitgever | Municipalities of Bubendorf, Meilersdorf, and Wolfsbach (Federal State of Lower Austria) |
|---|---|
| Jaar | 1920 |
| Type | Log in om details te zien |
| Waarde | 50 Hellers (0.50) |
| Valuta | Log in om details te zien |
| Samenstelling | Log in om details te zien |
| Afmetingen | Log in om details te zien |
| Vorm | Log in om details te zien |
| Drukker | Log in om details te zien |
| Ontwerper(s) | Log in om details te zien |
| Graveur(s) | Log in om details te zien |
| In omloop tot | Log in om details te zien |
| Referentie(s) | Log in om details te zien |
| Beschrijving voorzijde | Log in om details te zien |
|---|---|
| Opschrift voorzijde | Heller Gutschein der Gemeinden Bubendorf b. Meilersdorf u. Wolfsbach 50 Gültig bis 30. Dezemb 1920. Nachahmung wird bestraft Wolfsbach |
| Beschrijving keerzijde | Log in om details te zien |
| Opschrift keerzijde | Gutschein der Gemeinden Bubendorf, Meilersdorf, Wolfsbach. 50 Heller Die Gemeinde-Vorstehungen von Bubendorf, Meilersdorf und Wolfsbach haben in gemeinsamer Sitzung am 1. April 1920 beschlossen, Notgeld zu 10, 20 u. 50 Heller herauszugeben und haften gemeinsam für die Verbindlichkeit, diesen Schein in gesetzlich. Bargeld einzulösen. Die Bürgermeister der Gemeinden: Bubendorf: Meilersdorf: Wolfsbach: Meilersdorf, Herr von Wolfsbach Edle Gestreng Ritter, Herr Wolfgang von |
| Handtekening(en) | Log in om details te zien |
| Beveiligingstype | Log in om details te zien |
| Beschrijving beveiliging | Log in om details te zien |
| Varianten | Log in om details te zien |
| Opmerkingen |
This is a Notgeld issue — emergency small-change scrip produced by three Lower Austrian villages acting jointly because the postwar coin shortage made ordinary commerce nearly impossible. The arrangement was practical rather than administrative: Bubendorf, Meilersdorf, and Wolfsbach shared a single print run and split the issue, each contributing its own signatory. For rural municipalities with no printing infrastructure of their own, pooling was common.
The print figure of over 12 million pieces is high for a joint village issue, suggesting the notes circulated well beyond the three communities themselves.