Catalogus
Volledige afbeeldingen bekijken — gratis registratie
Doorgaan met Google — het is gratis
of registreer met e-mail
5 Soles de Oro
| Uitgever | Banco Central de Reserva del Perú |
|---|---|
| Jaar | 1968 |
| Type | Log in om details te zien |
| Waarde | Log in om details te zien |
| Valuta | Log in om details te zien |
| Samenstelling | Log in om details te zien |
| Afmetingen | 156 × 68 mm |
| Vorm | Log in om details te zien |
| Drukker | Log in om details te zien |
| Ontwerper(s) | Log in om details te zien |
| Graveur(s) | Log in om details te zien |
| In omloop tot | Log in om details te zien |
| Referentie(s) | Log in om details te zien |
| Beschrijving voorzijde | Log in om details te zien |
|---|---|
| Opschrift voorzijde | Log in om details te zien |
| Beschrijving keerzijde | Executed entirely in olive-green intaglio, the reverse is dominated by a panoramic landscape vignette of the Inca fortress of Sacsayhuamán near Cuzco, its massive hewn-stone terraces and walls extending across the full width of the note. 'BANCO CENTRAL DE RESERVA DEL PERÚ' runs along the upper border and 'CINCO SOLES DE ORO' appears in bold lettering along the lower margin. The caption 'FORTALEZA DE SACSAHUAMÁN' is inscribed in small text at the lower right of the central vignette, with the printer's imprint below. |
| Opschrift keerzijde | Log in om details te zien |
| Handtekening(en) | Log in om details te zien |
| Beveiligingstype | Watermark |
| Beschrijving beveiliging | Log in om details te zien |
| Varianten | Log in om details te zien |
| Opmerkingen |
Peru's Soles de Oro denominations were printed by De La Rue throughout much of the mid-twentieth century under long-running contracts that also covered several other South American central banks simultaneously. By 1968, the sol was already under inflationary pressure that would accelerate dramatically through the 1970s — this denomination, worth a fraction of a US cent by the time the Inti replaced the sol in 1985, was effectively rendered obsolete by economic forces rather than deliberate withdrawal.
P#92 sits in the middle of a run that changed relatively little across printings, making precise date attribution reliant on serial number prefixes rather than design differences.