Vollständige Bilder anzeigen — kostenlose Registrierung
Mit Google fortfahren — kostenlos oder mit E-Mail registrieren

5 Soles de Oro

Emittent Banco Central de Reserva del Perú
Jahr 1968
Typ Anmelden um Details zu sehen
Nennwert 5 Soles (5 PEH)
Währung Anmelden um Details zu sehen
Material Anmelden um Details zu sehen
Größe Anmelden um Details zu sehen
Form Anmelden um Details zu sehen
Druckerei Anmelden um Details zu sehen
Designer Anmelden um Details zu sehen
Stecher Anmelden um Details zu sehen
Im Umlauf bis Anmelden um Details zu sehen
Referenz(en) Anmelden um Details zu sehen
Vorderseitenbeschreibung Anmelden um Details zu sehen
Vorderseitenlegende Anmelden um Details zu sehen
Rückseitenbeschreibung Executed entirely in olive-green intaglio, the reverse is dominated by a panoramic landscape vignette of the Inca fortress of Sacsayhuamán near Cuzco, its massive hewn-stone terraces and walls extending across the full width of the note. 'BANCO CENTRAL DE RESERVA DEL PERÚ' runs along the upper border and 'CINCO SOLES DE ORO' appears in bold lettering along the lower margin. The caption 'FORTALEZA DE SACSAHUAMÁN' is inscribed in small text at the lower right of the central vignette, with the printer's imprint below.
Rückseitenlegende BANCO CENTRAL DE RESERVA DEL PERÚ
CINCO SOLES DE ORO
FORTALEZA DE SACSAHUAMÁN
THOMAS DE LA RUE & COMPANY LIMITED
Unterschrift(en) Anmelden um Details zu sehen
Sicherheitsmerkmal Anmelden um Details zu sehen
Beschreibung der Sicherheitsmerkmale Anmelden um Details zu sehen
Varianten Anmelden um Details zu sehen
Anmerkungen

Peru's Soles de Oro denominations were printed by De La Rue throughout much of the mid-twentieth century under long-running contracts that also covered several other South American central banks simultaneously. By 1968, the sol was already under inflationary pressure that would accelerate dramatically through the 1970s — this denomination, worth a fraction of a US cent by the time the Inti replaced the sol in 1985, was effectively rendered obsolete by economic forces rather than deliberate withdrawal.

P#92 sits in the middle of a run that changed relatively little across printings, making precise date attribution reliant on serial number prefixes rather than design differences.