Catalogus
Waarom registreren? Alleen om bots buiten ons catalogus te houden. Uw e-mail blijft privé — we delen het nooit en sturen u niets zonder uw toestemming. Dat garanderen wij u!
| Uitgever | Reserve Bank of Australia |
|---|---|
| Jaar | 1995-2015 |
| Type | Log in om details te zien |
| Waarde | Log in om details te zien |
| Valuta | Log in om details te zien |
| Samenstelling | Log in om details te zien |
| Afmetingen | Log in om details te zien |
| Vorm | Log in om details te zien |
| Drukker | Note Printing Australia, Melbourne, Australia (1998-date) |
| Ontwerper(s) | Log in om details te zien |
| Graveur(s) | Log in om details te zien |
| In omloop tot | Log in om details te zien |
| Referentie(s) | Log in om details te zien |
| Beschrijving voorzijde | Log in om details te zien |
|---|---|
| Opschrift voorzijde | Australia Five Dollars GOVERNOR RESERVE BANK OF AUSTRALIA SECRETARY TO THE TREASURY THIS AUSTRALIAN NOTE IS LEGAL TENDER THROUGHOUT AUSTRALIA AND ITS TERRITORIES |
| Beschrijving keerzijde | Log in om details te zien |
| Opschrift keerzijde | Australia |
| Handtekening(en) | Log in om details te zien |
| Beveiligingstype | Log in om details te zien |
| Beschrijving beveiliging | Log in om details te zien |
| Varianten | Log in om details te zien |
| Opmerkingen |
Australia's polymer $5 was part of the world's first complete polymer banknote series, a transition the Reserve Bank completed by 1996 after years of development with the Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation. The substrate itself was the story — Guardian polymer, manufactured by Innovia Films from a technology originally developed in Melbourne, eventually licensed to dozens of central banks globally.
The narrow orientation band error on the 1995 Evans & Fraser issue is a genuine production variant, not a cataloguing anomaly. The orientation bands — the clear strips visible under UV — were printed at incorrect width, likely during a press setup run before tolerances were corrected. The cataloguing confusion around the 2002 and 2003 dates, misattributed here to P#51 rather than P#57, reflects a long-standing Pick error that has caused persistent misidentification in dealer stock.