Vollständige Bilder anzeigen — kostenlose Registrierung
Mit Google fortfahren — kostenlos oder mit E-Mail registrieren

30 Para - Mahmud II type A, without lozenge

Emittent Tripoli, Regency of
Jahr 1808
Typ Standard circulation coin
Nennwert Anmelden um Details zu sehen
Währung Anmelden um Details zu sehen
Material Anmelden um Details zu sehen
Gewicht Anmelden um Details zu sehen
Durchmesser Anmelden um Details zu sehen
Dicke Anmelden um Details zu sehen
Form Anmelden um Details zu sehen
Prägetechnik Anmelden um Details zu sehen
Ausrichtung Anmelden um Details zu sehen
Stempelschneider Anmelden um Details zu sehen
Im Umlauf bis Anmelden um Details zu sehen
Referenz(en) Anmelden um Details zu sehen
Aversbeschreibung Anmelden um Details zu sehen
Aversschrift Arabic
Averslegende Anmelden um Details zu sehen
Reversbeschreibung The reverse bears a multi-line Arabic inscription in flowing calligraphic script occupying the entire field, recording the mint name and regnal year. The legend reads 'Struck in Tripoli West' (ضرب في طرابلس غرب) with the AH date 1223 and regnal year 20 disposed across three lines. A beaded border encircles the inscription. The broad, irregular flan and crude strike are consistent with provincial Ottoman hammered coinage of this period.
Reversschrift Anmelden um Details zu sehen
Reverslegende Anmelden um Details zu sehen
Rand Anmelden um Details zu sehen
Prägestätte Anmelden um Details zu sehen
Auflage Anmelden um Details zu sehen
Zusätzliche Informationen

Tripoli's regency operated with substantial autonomy from Istanbul throughout the early nineteenth century, and its coinage reflects that independence in practice if not in theory. The Karamanli dynasty, which governed Tripoli from 1711 until the Ottoman reconquest of 1835, issued coins nominally in the sultan's name while running fiscal policy almost entirely on its own terms. Billon issues of this period circulated alongside Spanish reales and other Mediterranean trade coinage, often at exchange rates set unilaterally by the regency's own treasury.

The absence of the lozenge ornament distinguishes this from the type B variety — a small but catalogically meaningful difference that likely reflects a die progression rather than a deliberate policy change.