Katalog
Vollständige Bilder anzeigen — kostenlose Registrierung
Mit Google fortfahren — kostenlos
oder mit E-Mail registrieren
2000 Francs
| Emittent | National Bank of Rwanda |
|---|---|
| Jahr | 2007 |
| Typ | Standard circulation banknote |
| Nennwert | Anmelden um Details zu sehen |
| Währung | Anmelden um Details zu sehen |
| Material | Anmelden um Details zu sehen |
| Größe | Anmelden um Details zu sehen |
| Form | Anmelden um Details zu sehen |
| Druckerei | Anmelden um Details zu sehen |
| Designer | Anmelden um Details zu sehen |
| Stecher | Anmelden um Details zu sehen |
| Im Umlauf bis | Anmelden um Details zu sehen |
| Referenz(en) | Anmelden um Details zu sehen |
| Vorderseitenbeschreibung | Blue on violet underprint with black serial numbers at upper right and lower left. A vignette of communication antennas occupies the central field, with a reflective security foil strip at left bearing repeating 'BNR' and '2000' devices. Legends in Kinyarwanda appear across the note face. |
|---|---|
| Vorderseitenlegende | Anmelden um Details zu sehen |
| Rückseitenbeschreibung | Blue on violet and purple underprint. The central design features a vignette of coffee beans, a principal agricultural motif of Rwanda. A segmented foil security thread is embedded at left, bearing repeating '2000' inscriptions. |
| Rückseitenlegende | Anmelden um Details zu sehen |
| Unterschrift(en) | Anmelden um Details zu sehen |
| Sicherheitsmerkmal | Anmelden um Details zu sehen |
| Beschreibung der Sicherheitsmerkmale | Anmelden um Details zu sehen |
| Varianten | Anmelden um Details zu sehen |
| Anmerkungen |
Rwanda's 2007 series was the first full redesign since the post-genocide monetary reconstruction of the mid-1990s, when the National Bank had to replace a currency stock that had been looted, destroyed, and counterfeited on a significant scale during and after 1994. Giesecke & Devrient, who had printed Rwandan notes through much of that difficult transition period, retained the contract here.
The "Printed: 30.04.1945" date in the source data is clearly erroneous — almost certainly a cataloging artifact — and should not be taken as a literal production date.