Æ15

İhraççı Epidauros
Yıl 250 BC - 200 BC
Tür Standard circulation coin
Değer
Para birimi Drachm
Bileşim Bronze
Ağırlık 1.83 g
Çap 15.0 mm
Kalınlık
Şekil Round (irregular)
Teknik Hammered
Yönlendirme
Gravürcü(ler)
Dolaşımda olduğu yıl
Referans(lar) BCD Peloponnesos#1249
Ön yüz açıklaması Laureate head of Asklepios facing right
Ön yüz yazısı
Ön yüz lejandı
Arka yüz açıklaması Coiled serpent facing right
Arka yüz yazısı
Arka yüz lejandı
Kenar
Darphane
Basma adedi ND (250 BC - 200 BC) - -
Numisquare Kimliği 5459099300
Ek bilgiler

Historical Context: This Æ15 coin from Epidauros dates to the Hellenistic period, specifically 250 BC - 200 BC. Epidauros, a prominent Peloponnesian city-state, was celebrated throughout the ancient world for its sanctuary of Asclepius, the god of medicine. During this era, Epidauros maintained its cultural and religious significance, attracting pilgrims and patients, which underpinned its local economy. Its civic authorities oversaw minting, reflecting continued autonomy amidst larger Hellenistic powers.

Artistry: The engraver remains anonymous, typical for municipal bronze issues of the Hellenistic period. Stylistically, it aligns with the Hellenistic Greek tradition, blending classical idealism with emerging realism. Common designs for Epidauros bronzes feature the laureate head of Asclepius on the obverse, often depicted with a dignified yet benevolent expression. The reverse typically displays symbols associated with the cult, such as the snake-entwined staff of Asclepius or a coiled serpent, sometimes accompanied by the ethnic ΕΠΙ or a monogram.

Technical/Grading: Struck on a small, lightweight bronze flan (15.0 mm, 1.83 gg), this Æ15 was likely a fractional denomination for daily transactions. High-points for wear, assuming an Asclepius head, would be the hair over the forehead, nose, and chin. On the reverse, the serpent's head and highest coils of the staff would show earliest abrasion. Technical strike quality can vary; factors like centering, flan preparation, and die wear are crucial for assessing preservation. Poor centering or uneven strike are common given ancient methods.

×