Katalog
| Emitent | Epidauros |
|---|---|
| Rok | 250 BC - 200 BC |
| Typ | Standard circulation coin |
| Nominał | |
| Waluta | Drachm |
| Skład | Bronze |
| Waga | 1.83 g |
| Średnica | 15.0 mm |
| Grubość | |
| Kształt | Round (irregular) |
| Technika | Hammered |
| Orientacja | |
| Rytownik(zy) | |
| W obiegu do | |
| Źródło(a) | BCD Peloponnesos#1249 |
| Opis awersu | Laureate head of Asklepios facing right |
|---|---|
| Pismo awersu | |
| Legenda awersu | |
| Opis rewersu | Coiled serpent facing right |
| Pismo rewersu | |
| Legenda rewersu | |
| Krawędź | |
| Mennica | |
| Nakład |
ND (250 BC - 200 BC) - - |
| ID Numisquare | 5459099300 |
| Dodatkowe informacje |
Historical Context: This Æ15 coin from Epidauros dates to the Hellenistic period, specifically 250 BC - 200 BC. Epidauros, a prominent Peloponnesian city-state, was celebrated throughout the ancient world for its sanctuary of Asclepius, the god of medicine. During this era, Epidauros maintained its cultural and religious significance, attracting pilgrims and patients, which underpinned its local economy. Its civic authorities oversaw minting, reflecting continued autonomy amidst larger Hellenistic powers.
Artistry: The engraver remains anonymous, typical for municipal bronze issues of the Hellenistic period. Stylistically, it aligns with the Hellenistic Greek tradition, blending classical idealism with emerging realism. Common designs for Epidauros bronzes feature the laureate head of Asclepius on the obverse, often depicted with a dignified yet benevolent expression. The reverse typically displays symbols associated with the cult, such as the snake-entwined staff of Asclepius or a coiled serpent, sometimes accompanied by the ethnic ΕΠΙ or a monogram.
Technical/Grading: Struck on a small, lightweight bronze flan (15.0 mm, 1.83 gg), this Æ15 was likely a fractional denomination for daily transactions. High-points for wear, assuming an Asclepius head, would be the hair over the forehead, nose, and chin. On the reverse, the serpent's head and highest coils of the staff would show earliest abrasion. Technical strike quality can vary; factors like centering, flan preparation, and die wear are crucial for assessing preservation. Poor centering or uneven strike are common given ancient methods.