Æ15

Emittent Epidauros
Jahr 250 BC - 200 BC
Typ Standard circulation coin
Nennwert
Währung Drachm
Material Bronze
Gewicht 1.83 g
Durchmesser 15.0 mm
Dicke
Form Round (irregular)
Prägetechnik Hammered
Ausrichtung
Stempelschneider
Im Umlauf bis
Referenz(en) BCD Peloponnesos#1249
Aversbeschreibung Laureate head of Asklepios facing right
Aversschrift
Averslegende
Reversbeschreibung Coiled serpent facing right
Reversschrift
Reverslegende
Rand
Prägestätte
Auflage ND (250 BC - 200 BC) - -
Numisquare-ID 5459099300
Zusätzliche Informationen

Historical Context: This Æ15 coin from Epidauros dates to the Hellenistic period, specifically 250 BC - 200 BC. Epidauros, a prominent Peloponnesian city-state, was celebrated throughout the ancient world for its sanctuary of Asclepius, the god of medicine. During this era, Epidauros maintained its cultural and religious significance, attracting pilgrims and patients, which underpinned its local economy. Its civic authorities oversaw minting, reflecting continued autonomy amidst larger Hellenistic powers.

Artistry: The engraver remains anonymous, typical for municipal bronze issues of the Hellenistic period. Stylistically, it aligns with the Hellenistic Greek tradition, blending classical idealism with emerging realism. Common designs for Epidauros bronzes feature the laureate head of Asclepius on the obverse, often depicted with a dignified yet benevolent expression. The reverse typically displays symbols associated with the cult, such as the snake-entwined staff of Asclepius or a coiled serpent, sometimes accompanied by the ethnic ΕΠΙ or a monogram.

Technical/Grading: Struck on a small, lightweight bronze flan (15.0 mm, 1.83 gg), this Æ15 was likely a fractional denomination for daily transactions. High-points for wear, assuming an Asclepius head, would be the hair over the forehead, nose, and chin. On the reverse, the serpent's head and highest coils of the staff would show earliest abrasion. Technical strike quality can vary; factors like centering, flan preparation, and die wear are crucial for assessing preservation. Poor centering or uneven strike are common given ancient methods.

×