Katalog
| Emittent | Carthage, Vandal City of |
|---|---|
| Jahr | 523-533 |
| Typ | Standard circulation coin |
| Nennwert | Anmelden um Details zu sehen |
| Währung | Anmelden um Details zu sehen |
| Material | Anmelden um Details zu sehen |
| Gewicht | Anmelden um Details zu sehen |
| Durchmesser | Anmelden um Details zu sehen |
| Dicke | Anmelden um Details zu sehen |
| Form | Anmelden um Details zu sehen |
| Prägetechnik | Anmelden um Details zu sehen |
| Ausrichtung | Anmelden um Details zu sehen |
| Stempelschneider | Anmelden um Details zu sehen |
| Im Umlauf bis | Anmelden um Details zu sehen |
| Referenz(en) | Anmelden um Details zu sehen |
| Aversbeschreibung | Anmelden um Details zu sehen |
|---|---|
| Aversschrift | Anmelden um Details zu sehen |
| Averslegende | Anmelden um Details zu sehen |
| Reversbeschreibung | Horse's head facing right, rendered in a bold but schematic style, occupying the upper portion of the flan. A horizontal line divides the field, below which the value mark XII appears in large Roman numerals in the exergue. The horse motif is a direct reference to the ancient Carthaginian iconographic tradition. The overall execution is coarse, consistent with the debased municipal bronze coinage struck at Carthage under late Vandal administration. |
| Reversschrift | Anmelden um Details zu sehen |
| Reverslegende | Anmelden um Details zu sehen |
| Rand | Plain |
| Prägestätte | Anmelden um Details zu sehen |
| Auflage | Anmelden um Details zu sehen |
| Zusätzliche Informationen |
These bronze fractions were struck under the last Vandal kings — almost certainly Hilderic and Gelimer — during the decade preceding Belisarius's swift North African campaign of 533, which collapsed the kingdom in under a year. Carthage had held the denomination system inherited from the late Roman West, and the 12 nummi piece occupied a practical middle register in daily transactions across a city that remained one of the Mediterranean's busiest ports despite a century of Vandal rule.
The attribution spread across Hilderic and Gelimer reflects genuine scholarly uncertainty; the coinage of this final phase was neither systematically dated nor consistently mint-marked.