Volledige afbeeldingen bekijken — gratis registratie
Doorgaan met Google — het is gratis of registreer met e-mail

Waarom registreren? Alleen om bots buiten ons catalogus te houden. Uw e-mail blijft privé — we delen het nooit en sturen u niets zonder uw toestemming. Dat garanderen wij u!

10 Taels

Uitgever Imperial Bank of China
Jaar 1898
Type Log in om details te zien
Waarde Log in om details te zien
Valuta Log in om details te zien
Samenstelling Log in om details te zien
Afmetingen Log in om details te zien
Vorm Log in om details te zien
Drukker Bradbury, Wilkinson & Company
Ontwerper(s) Log in om details te zien
Graveur(s) Log in om details te zien
In omloop tot Log in om details te zien
Referentie(s) Log in om details te zien
Beschrijving voorzijde Printed in red on cream paper with an ornate guilloche border. Two dragons flank a central roundel at upper center, with Chinese inscriptions giving the denomination of ten taels (拾兩) at center. Date given as the 24th year of Guangxu, 1st month (大清光緒二十四年正月), Shanghai branch (中國上海通商銀行).
Opschrift voorzijde 中國通商銀行鈔票永遠通用
大清光緒二十四年正月吉日
中國上海通商銀行
銀祇認票不認人
拾兩
Beschrijving keerzijde Log in om details te zien
Opschrift keerzijde Log in om details te zien
Handtekening(en) Log in om details te zien
Beveiligingstype Log in om details te zien
Beschrijving beveiliging Log in om details te zien
Varianten Log in om details te zien
Opmerkingen

The Imperial Bank of China was itself only chartered in 1897, making this note among the earliest the institution ever produced. Bradbury, Wilkinson engraved and printed the series in London, a common arrangement for Chinese banking institutions of the period that lacked domestic security printing infrastructure capable of meeting anti-counterfeiting standards.

The tael denomination is worth noting: the tael was a weight-based monetary unit, not a coin, and its actual silver value varied considerably by region — Shanghai taels, Haikwan taels, and Peking taels were not interchangeable. A banknote denominated in taels therefore carried an implicit ambiguity about exactly what it promised to pay, and where.

MISSCHIEN OOK INTERESSANT