Vollständige Bilder anzeigen — kostenlose Registrierung
Mit Google fortfahren — kostenlos oder mit E-Mail registrieren

10 Dollars

Emittent Board of Commissioners of Currency, Malaya and British Borneo
Jahr 1961
Typ Anmelden um Details zu sehen
Nennwert Anmelden um Details zu sehen
Währung Anmelden um Details zu sehen
Material Cotton paper
Größe Anmelden um Details zu sehen
Form Anmelden um Details zu sehen
Druckerei Anmelden um Details zu sehen
Designer Anmelden um Details zu sehen
Stecher Anmelden um Details zu sehen
Im Umlauf bis Anmelden um Details zu sehen
Referenz(en) Anmelden um Details zu sehen
Vorderseitenbeschreibung A vignette at right portrays a farmer guiding a wooden plough drawn by two water buffalo across a paddy field, rendered in fine intaglio lines. At left, an oval guilloche frame serves as the watermark window, flanked by the denomination numeral '10' in red on both upper corners. The lower portion carries the legal tender inscription in English, Malay, Chinese, and Tamil scripts, dated 1st March 1961, with a printed signature below.
Vorderseitenlegende Anmelden um Details zu sehen
Rückseitenbeschreibung Anmelden um Details zu sehen
Rückseitenlegende Anmelden um Details zu sehen
Unterschrift(en) Anmelden um Details zu sehen
Sicherheitsmerkmal Watermark
Beschreibung der Sicherheitsmerkmale Anmelden um Details zu sehen
Varianten Anmelden um Details zu sehen
Anmerkungen

The Board of Commissioners of Currency, Malaya and British Borneo was a joint issuing authority covering what would soon become three separate sovereign states — Malaysia, Singapore, and Brunei. This 1961 note was printed well into the twilight of that arrangement; political pressure for independent currencies was already building, and the Board was dissolved in 1967 when the three-way currency interchangeability agreement finally collapsed.

Thomas De La Rue held the printing contract throughout the Board's existence. The P#9 series is not especially scarce in circulated grades, but notes retaining strong color are harder to find than the survival numbers suggest — the paper responds poorly to the humidity and handling conditions typical of the region.