Catalogus
| Uitgever | Uncertain Etruscan mint |
|---|---|
| Jaar | 225 BC - 211 BC |
| Type | Log in om details te zien |
| Waarde | Log in om details te zien |
| Valuta | Log in om details te zien |
| Samenstelling | Log in om details te zien |
| Gewicht | Log in om details te zien |
| Diameter | Log in om details te zien |
| Dikte | 3.8 mm |
| Vorm | Log in om details te zien |
| Techniek | Log in om details te zien |
| Oriëntatie | Log in om details te zien |
| Graveur(s) | Log in om details te zien |
| In omloop tot | Log in om details te zien |
| Referentie(s) | Log in om details te zien |
| Beschrijving voorzijde | Log in om details te zien |
|---|---|
| Schrift voorzijde | Log in om details te zien |
| Opschrift voorzijde | Log in om details te zien |
| Beschrijving keerzijde | Log in om details te zien |
| Schrift keerzijde | Log in om details te zien |
| Opschrift keerzijde | C |
| Rand | Log in om details te zien |
| Muntplaats | Log in om details te zien |
| Oplage | ND (225 BC - 211 BC) |
| Aanvullende informatie |
The attribution "uncertain Etruscan mint" understates a genuine scholarly disagreement — some authorities place this series at Cosa, others at Populonia, and the question has not been resolved. What is clear is that the wheel and anchor types belong to a transitional moment when central Etruscan communities were renegotiating their commercial relationships with Rome under pressure from the Second Punic War's economic disruptions. The uncia denomination signals integration into the Roman libral weight system, even as the iconographic choices remained stubbornly local.
Struck rather than cast, which distinguishes it sharply from contemporary Roman aes grave of the same period.