Catalog
| Issuer | Uncertain Etruscan mint |
|---|---|
| Year | 225 BC - 211 BC |
| Type | Log in to see details |
| Value | Log in to see details |
| Currency | Log in to see details |
| Composition | Log in to see details |
| Weight | Log in to see details |
| Diameter | Log in to see details |
| Thickness | 3.8 mm |
| Shape | Log in to see details |
| Technique | Log in to see details |
| Orientation | Log in to see details |
| Engraver(s) | Log in to see details |
| In circulation to | Log in to see details |
| Reference(s) | Log in to see details |
| Obverse description | Log in to see details |
|---|---|
| Obverse script | Log in to see details |
| Obverse lettering | Log in to see details |
| Reverse description | Log in to see details |
| Reverse script | Log in to see details |
| Reverse lettering | C |
| Edge | Log in to see details |
| Mint | Log in to see details |
| Mintage | ND (225 BC - 211 BC) |
| Additional information |
The attribution "uncertain Etruscan mint" understates a genuine scholarly disagreement — some authorities place this series at Cosa, others at Populonia, and the question has not been resolved. What is clear is that the wheel and anchor types belong to a transitional moment when central Etruscan communities were renegotiating their commercial relationships with Rome under pressure from the Second Punic War's economic disruptions. The uncia denomination signals integration into the Roman libral weight system, even as the iconographic choices remained stubbornly local.
Struck rather than cast, which distinguishes it sharply from contemporary Roman aes grave of the same period.