Catalog
Why register? Just to keep bots out of our catalog. Your email stays private - we will never share it or send you anything uninvited. We guarantee you that!
| Issuer | Jaisalmer, Princely state of |
|---|---|
| Year | 1756 |
| Type | Log in to see details |
| Value | 1 Rupee |
| Currency | Log in to see details |
| Composition | Log in to see details |
| Weight | Log in to see details |
| Diameter | Log in to see details |
| Thickness | Log in to see details |
| Shape | Log in to see details |
| Technique | Log in to see details |
| Orientation | Log in to see details |
| Engraver(s) | Log in to see details |
| In circulation to | Log in to see details |
| Reference(s) | Log in to see details |
| Obverse description | Hammered silver flan bearing multi-line Persian or Nagari legend arranged in two horizontal bands separated by a raised line, with dot clusters distributed across the upper field serving as decorative or mint-mark elements. The inscription is rendered in bold relief in a style consistent with Rajput princely coinage of the mid-eighteenth century. The overall die-work is characteristic of the irregular, hand-struck fabric typical of Jaisalmer State issues. |
|---|---|
| Obverse script | Log in to see details |
| Obverse lettering | Log in to see details |
| Reverse description | Log in to see details |
| Reverse script | Log in to see details |
| Reverse lettering | ٢٢ |
| Edge | Log in to see details |
| Mint | Log in to see details |
| Mintage | Log in to see details |
| Additional information |
Jaisalmer was among the most isolated mints in Rajputana — the fortress city sits deep in the Thar Desert, and its coinage reflects a economy built more on caravan taxation than agricultural surplus. Ranjit Singh ruled from 1762 to 1820, which creates an immediate difficulty: a coin attributed to his reign and dated 1756 predates his accession by six years. The date almost certainly reflects a frozen or ceremonial regal year carried forward from an earlier authority, a practice common in Rajput states where continuous dynastic legitimacy mattered more than calendrical precision.