Volledige afbeeldingen bekijken — gratis registratie
Doorgaan met Google — het is gratis of registreer met e-mail

Waarom registreren? Alleen om bots buiten ons catalogus te houden. Uw e-mail blijft privé — we delen het nooit en sturen u niets zonder uw toestemming. Dat garanderen wij u!

1 Drachm - Anonymous Alexander Imitation, Kashkadarya

Uitgever Kashkadarya Valley
Jaar 230 BC - 50 AD
Type Standard circulation coin
Waarde Log in om details te zien
Valuta Log in om details te zien
Samenstelling Log in om details te zien
Gewicht Log in om details te zien
Diameter Log in om details te zien
Dikte Log in om details te zien
Vorm Log in om details te zien
Techniek Log in om details te zien
Oriëntatie Log in om details te zien
Graveur(s) Log in om details te zien
In omloop tot Log in om details te zien
Referentie(s) Log in om details te zien
Beschrijving voorzijde Log in om details te zien
Schrift voorzijde Log in om details te zien
Opschrift voorzijde Log in om details te zien
Beschrijving keerzijde Imitative depiction of Zeus Aëtophoros enthroned to the left, nude to the waist and draped across the lap, seated upon a high-backed throne with elaborately rendered legs. The deity extends his right hand forward, upon which an eagle is schematically indicated, while his left hand rests on a long scepter. The composition closely follows the reverse type of Alexander III drachms but is rendered in a markedly barbarized style, with simplified and stylized anatomical details consistent with local Central Asian imitative coinage of the Kashkadarya Valley. No legend is present, reflecting the anonymous nature of this emission.
Schrift keerzijde Log in om details te zien
Opschrift keerzijde Log in om details te zien
Rand Log in om details te zien
Muntplaats Log in om details te zien
Oplage ND (230 BC - 50 AD)
Aanvullende informatie

The Kashkadarya Valley — ancient Nautaka, a region of what is now southern Uzbekistan — produced a long series of anonymous imitations of Alexander III tetradrachms and fractions that continued circulating centuries after the Macedonian prototype had ceased to mean anything politically. These local silver pieces served the practical needs of an economy that had absorbed Greek monetary conventions through Seleucid and Greco-Bactrian intermediaries without ever quite being part of those states. The extreme date range reflects genuine scholarly uncertainty: die studies have not yet produced a tight chronology, and the types blur across generations of local authority.

MISSCHIEN OOK INTERESSANT