See full images - free registration
Continue with Google - no registration! or register with email

Why register? Just to keep bots out of our catalog. Your email stays private - we will never share it or send you anything uninvited. We guarantee you that!

1 Drachm - Anonymous Alexander Imitation, Kashkadarya

Issuer Kashkadarya Valley
Year 230 BC - 50 AD
Type Standard circulation coin
Value Log in to see details
Currency Log in to see details
Composition Log in to see details
Weight Log in to see details
Diameter Log in to see details
Thickness Log in to see details
Shape Log in to see details
Technique Log in to see details
Orientation Log in to see details
Engraver(s) Log in to see details
In circulation to Log in to see details
Reference(s) Log in to see details
Obverse description Log in to see details
Obverse script Log in to see details
Obverse lettering Log in to see details
Reverse description Imitative depiction of Zeus Aëtophoros enthroned to the left, nude to the waist and draped across the lap, seated upon a high-backed throne with elaborately rendered legs. The deity extends his right hand forward, upon which an eagle is schematically indicated, while his left hand rests on a long scepter. The composition closely follows the reverse type of Alexander III drachms but is rendered in a markedly barbarized style, with simplified and stylized anatomical details consistent with local Central Asian imitative coinage of the Kashkadarya Valley. No legend is present, reflecting the anonymous nature of this emission.
Reverse script Log in to see details
Reverse lettering Log in to see details
Edge Log in to see details
Mint Log in to see details
Mintage ND (230 BC - 50 AD)
Additional information

The Kashkadarya Valley — ancient Nautaka, a region of what is now southern Uzbekistan — produced a long series of anonymous imitations of Alexander III tetradrachms and fractions that continued circulating centuries after the Macedonian prototype had ceased to mean anything politically. These local silver pieces served the practical needs of an economy that had absorbed Greek monetary conventions through Seleucid and Greco-Bactrian intermediaries without ever quite being part of those states. The extreme date range reflects genuine scholarly uncertainty: die studies have not yet produced a tight chronology, and the types blur across generations of local authority.

YOU MAY ALSO LIKE