目录
查看完整图片 — 免费注册
使用Google继续 — 免费
或用邮箱注册
为什么需要注册？只是为了防止机器人访问我们的目录。您的邮箱完全保密——我们绝不会分享或在未经您许可的情况下发送任何内容。我们向您保证！
| 正面描述 | 登录 以查看详情 |
|---|---|
| 正面文字 | 登录 以查看详情 |
| 正面铭文 | 登录 以查看详情 |
| 背面描述 | Stylized horse prancing left in the characteristic Celtic abstract manner, its body reduced to sinuous curvilinear forms with exaggerated musculature. The horse's head is rendered with a large circular eye and flowing mane indicated by pellet clusters, while the legs are schematized into bold curved lines. A large circular annulet or ring motif appears above the horse in the upper field, a common celticized design element. Additional pellets and abstract forms fill the field around the horse, consistent with Eastern European Celtic coinage of the period. The overall composition reflects advanced stylistic abstraction from the original Macedonian or Thasian drachm prototype. |
| 背面文字 | 登录 以查看详情 |
| 背面铭文 | 登录 以查看详情 |
| 边缘 | Plain |
| 铸币厂 | 登录 以查看详情 |
| 铸造量 | 登录 以查看详情 |
| 附加信息 |
The attribution "Uncertain Eastern European Celts" reflects a genuine scholarly impasse — these lightweight drachms circulated across a zone stretching from the middle Danube basin into the Carpathian region, produced by tribal groups whose political identities remain unresolved in the archaeological record. They derive ultimately from Macedonian prototypes, Philip II's coinage specifically, filtered through generations of Celtic imitation until the originals became almost unrecognizable. Göbl's Ostkeltischer Typenatlas remains the essential reference, though his typological boundaries have been contested repeatedly since publication.