Catalog
Why register? Just to keep bots out of our catalog. Your email stays private - we will never share it or send you anything uninvited. We guarantee you that!
| Issuer | Uncertain Eastern European Celts |
|---|---|
| Year | 200 BC - 100 BC |
| Type | Log in to see details |
| Value | Log in to see details |
| Currency | Drachm |
| Composition | Log in to see details |
| Weight | Log in to see details |
| Diameter | Log in to see details |
| Thickness | Log in to see details |
| Shape | Log in to see details |
| Technique | Log in to see details |
| Orientation | Log in to see details |
| Engraver(s) | Log in to see details |
| In circulation to | Log in to see details |
| Reference(s) | Log in to see details |
| Obverse description | Log in to see details |
|---|---|
| Obverse script | Log in to see details |
| Obverse lettering | Log in to see details |
| Reverse description | Stylized horse prancing left in the characteristic Celtic abstract manner, its body reduced to sinuous curvilinear forms with exaggerated musculature. The horse's head is rendered with a large circular eye and flowing mane indicated by pellet clusters, while the legs are schematized into bold curved lines. A large circular annulet or ring motif appears above the horse in the upper field, a common celticized design element. Additional pellets and abstract forms fill the field around the horse, consistent with Eastern European Celtic coinage of the period. The overall composition reflects advanced stylistic abstraction from the original Macedonian or Thasian drachm prototype. |
| Reverse script | Log in to see details |
| Reverse lettering | Log in to see details |
| Edge | Plain |
| Mint | Log in to see details |
| Mintage | Log in to see details |
| Additional information |
The attribution "Uncertain Eastern European Celts" reflects a genuine scholarly impasse — these lightweight drachms circulated across a zone stretching from the middle Danube basin into the Carpathian region, produced by tribal groups whose political identities remain unresolved in the archaeological record. They derive ultimately from Macedonian prototypes, Philip II's coinage specifically, filtered through generations of Celtic imitation until the originals became almost unrecognizable. Göbl's Ostkeltischer Typenatlas remains the essential reference, though his typological boundaries have been contested repeatedly since publication.