Catalogus
Volledige afbeeldingen bekijken — gratis registratie
Doorgaan met Google — het is gratis
of registreer met e-mail
Waarom registreren? Alleen om bots buiten ons catalogus te houden. Uw e-mail blijft privé — we delen het nooit en sturen u niets zonder uw toestemming. Dat garanderen wij u!
1 Dollar
| Uitgever | Bank of Canada / Banque du Canada |
|---|---|
| Jaar | 1954 |
| Type | Standard circulation banknote |
| Waarde | Log in om details te zien |
| Valuta | Log in om details te zien |
| Samenstelling | Log in om details te zien |
| Afmetingen | Log in om details te zien |
| Vorm | Log in om details te zien |
| Drukker | Log in om details te zien |
| Ontwerper(s) | Log in om details te zien |
| Graveur(s) | Log in om details te zien |
| In omloop tot | Log in om details te zien |
| Referentie(s) | Log in om details te zien |
| Beschrijving voorzijde | Log in om details te zien |
|---|---|
| Opschrift voorzijde | Log in om details te zien |
| Beschrijving keerzijde | Log in om details te zien |
| Opschrift keerzijde | ONE DOLLAR 1 UN DOLLAR BANK OF CANADA – BANQUE DU CANADA ONE DOLLAR UN DOLLAR |
| Handtekening(en) | Log in om details te zien |
| Beveiligingstype | Log in om details te zien |
| Beschrijving beveiliging | Log in om details te zien |
| Varianten | P#66a - Signature Coyne-Towers. Devil's Face hairdo P#66b - Signature Beattie-Coyne. Devil's Face hairdo |
| Opmerkingen |
The 1954 series is best known for the "Devil's Face" controversy — early printings showed the Queen's hair highlighted in a way that appeared to many observers to contain a demonic profile in the shadows behind her ear. The Canadian Bank Note Company modified the hair shading in 1956 to eliminate the effect, creating a clean distinction between the earlier "Devil's Face" and later "Modified" varieties that collectors now treat as separate issues entirely.
The Rasminsky/Towers signature combination listed under 1972 warrants scrutiny — Towers had left the Bank of Canada governorship in 1954, and any such pairing on this series would be anomalous. Verify against the physical note before cataloging.