Katalog
Warum registrieren? Nur um Bots aus unserem Katalog fernzuhalten. Ihre E-Mail bleibt privat — wir geben sie nie weiter und senden Ihnen nichts Unerwünschtes. Das garantieren wir Ihnen!
| Emittent | Imperial Chinese Railways |
|---|---|
| Jahr | 1895 |
| Typ | Anmelden um Details zu sehen |
| Nennwert | Anmelden um Details zu sehen |
| Währung | Dollar (1898-1911) |
| Material | Anmelden um Details zu sehen |
| Größe | Anmelden um Details zu sehen |
| Form | Anmelden um Details zu sehen |
| Druckerei | Anmelden um Details zu sehen |
| Designer | Anmelden um Details zu sehen |
| Stecher | Anmelden um Details zu sehen |
| Im Umlauf bis | Anmelden um Details zu sehen |
| Referenz(en) | Anmelden um Details zu sehen |
| Vorderseitenbeschreibung | Dated 22.4.1895. Blue ink on orange underprint. Central vignette of a train passing through a fortress gateway. Vertical Chinese script inscriptions surround the central design, with guilloche border framing. Issued by the Peiyang Branch. |
|---|---|
| Vorderseitenlegende | Anmelden um Details zu sehen |
| Rückseitenbeschreibung | Anmelden um Details zu sehen |
| Rückseitenlegende | Anmelden um Details zu sehen |
| Unterschrift(en) | Anmelden um Details zu sehen |
| Sicherheitsmerkmal | Anmelden um Details zu sehen |
| Beschreibung der Sicherheitsmerkmale | Anmelden um Details zu sehen |
| Varianten | P#A56a - Issued note P#A56r - Unsigned remainder |
| Anmerkungen |
Imperial Chinese Railways was not a central bank or provincial treasury but a quasi-governmental infrastructure body, and its 1895 dollar note reflects that unusual status — issued to facilitate railway construction financing at a moment when the Qing dynasty was scrambling to fund modernization without surrendering full control to foreign creditors. The timing is pointed: 1895 is the year the Treaty of Shimonoseki ended the First Sino-Japanese War, and railway concessions were already becoming a flashpoint for foreign pressure on Chinese sovereignty.
Barclay & Fry of London printed the note. The firm handled a range of colonial and quasi-colonial financial instruments in this period, though they were less prominent than contemporaries like Bradbury Wilkinson or De La Rue.