Catalogus
Waarom registreren? Alleen om bots buiten ons catalogus te houden. Uw e-mail blijft privé — we delen het nooit en sturen u niets zonder uw toestemming. Dat garanderen wij u!
| Uitgever | Beylik of Eshref |
|---|---|
| Jaar | 1320-1329 |
| Type | Log in om details te zien |
| Waarde | 1 Dirham (0.7) |
| Valuta | Log in om details te zien |
| Samenstelling | Log in om details te zien |
| Gewicht | Log in om details te zien |
| Diameter | Log in om details te zien |
| Dikte | Log in om details te zien |
| Vorm | Log in om details te zien |
| Techniek | Log in om details te zien |
| Oriëntatie | Log in om details te zien |
| Graveur(s) | Log in om details te zien |
| In omloop tot | Log in om details te zien |
| Referentie(s) | Log in om details te zien |
| Beschrijving voorzijde | Log in om details te zien |
|---|---|
| Schrift voorzijde | Log in om details te zien |
| Opschrift voorzijde | Log in om details te zien |
| Beschrijving keerzijde | Hammered silver flan of irregular round shape bearing multiple lines of Arabic legend in Naskh script, disposed across the central field within a decorative border of intertwined foliate or rope-pattern design. The reverse die carries religious and dynastic inscriptions consistent with Ilkhanid-influenced Anatolian beylik coinage. One or both of the al-mubarizi countermarks are also visible on this face, their raised oval impressions partially overlapping the underlying legends. The flan shows typical characteristics of hand-struck medieval Islamic silver coinage, including uneven edges and surface flow lines. |
| Schrift keerzijde | Arabic |
| Opschrift keerzijde | Log in om details te zien |
| Rand | Log in om details te zien |
| Muntplaats | Log in om details te zien |
| Oplage | Log in om details te zien |
| Aanvullende informatie |
The Beylik of Eshref was one of the smaller Anatolian principalities that emerged following the Mongol-driven fragmentation of Seljuk authority in the early fourteenth century. Countermarking existing dirhams with "al-mubarizi" — a title invoking martial virtue and combat readiness — was a political act as much as a monetary one, asserting legitimacy over coinage that hadn't been struck under Eshrefid authority. The double application of the countermark on a single coin is unusual and likely reflects either sequential administrative validation or reuse after the coin re-entered official channels.