Catalog
Why register? Just to keep bots out of our catalog. Your email stays private - we will never share it or send you anything uninvited. We guarantee you that!
| Issuer | Beylik of Eshref |
|---|---|
| Year | 1320-1329 |
| Type | Log in to see details |
| Value | 1 Dirham (0.7) |
| Currency | Log in to see details |
| Composition | Log in to see details |
| Weight | Log in to see details |
| Diameter | Log in to see details |
| Thickness | Log in to see details |
| Shape | Log in to see details |
| Technique | Log in to see details |
| Orientation | Log in to see details |
| Engraver(s) | Log in to see details |
| In circulation to | Log in to see details |
| Reference(s) | Log in to see details |
| Obverse description | Log in to see details |
|---|---|
| Obverse script | Log in to see details |
| Obverse lettering | Log in to see details |
| Reverse description | Hammered silver flan of irregular round shape bearing multiple lines of Arabic legend in Naskh script, disposed across the central field within a decorative border of intertwined foliate or rope-pattern design. The reverse die carries religious and dynastic inscriptions consistent with Ilkhanid-influenced Anatolian beylik coinage. One or both of the al-mubarizi countermarks are also visible on this face, their raised oval impressions partially overlapping the underlying legends. The flan shows typical characteristics of hand-struck medieval Islamic silver coinage, including uneven edges and surface flow lines. |
| Reverse script | Arabic |
| Reverse lettering | Log in to see details |
| Edge | Log in to see details |
| Mint | Log in to see details |
| Mintage | Log in to see details |
| Additional information |
The Beylik of Eshref was one of the smaller Anatolian principalities that emerged following the Mongol-driven fragmentation of Seljuk authority in the early fourteenth century. Countermarking existing dirhams with "al-mubarizi" — a title invoking martial virtue and combat readiness — was a political act as much as a monetary one, asserting legitimacy over coinage that hadn't been struck under Eshrefid authority. The double application of the countermark on a single coin is unusual and likely reflects either sequential administrative validation or reuse after the coin re-entered official channels.