Catalogus
Volledige afbeeldingen bekijken — gratis registratie
Doorgaan met Google — het is gratis
of registreer met e-mail
Waarom registreren? Alleen om bots buiten ons catalogus te houden. Uw e-mail blijft privé — we delen het nooit en sturen u niets zonder uw toestemming. Dat garanderen wij u!
1 Cent Ohio Sales Tax Receipt
| Uitgever | State of Ohio |
|---|---|
| Jaar | 1959 |
| Type | Log in om details te zien |
| Waarde | Log in om details te zien |
| Valuta | Log in om details te zien |
| Samenstelling | Log in om details te zien |
| Afmetingen | 77 x 35 mm |
| Vorm | Log in om details te zien |
| Drukker | Log in om details te zien |
| Ontwerper(s) | Log in om details te zien |
| Graveur(s) | Log in om details te zien |
| In omloop tot | Log in om details te zien |
| Referentie(s) | Log in om details te zien |
| Beschrijving voorzijde | Pale green receipt printed in brown, divided into a left vendor's stub and a right consumer portion. The consumer section bears two circular numeral '1' medallions flanking a central landscape vignette, above a rectangular panel with tax instruction text in letterpress. Printer's imprint appears at foot. |
|---|---|
| Opschrift voorzijde | Log in om details te zien |
| Beschrijving keerzijde | Log in om details te zien |
| Opschrift keerzijde | Log in om details te zien |
| Handtekening(en) | Log in om details te zien |
| Beveiligingstype | Watermark |
| Beschrijving beveiliging | Log in om details te zien |
| Varianten | Log in om details te zien |
| Opmerkingen |
Ohio's sales tax token program was already a relic by the time these receipts were printed. Most U.S. states had abandoned fractional tax tokens by the early 1940s, recognizing them as an administrative nuisance. Ohio issued these paper receipts unusually late into the postwar period, well after aluminum and fiber tokens had been phased out elsewhere — a bureaucratic conservatism that makes the series mildly anomalous in American fiscal history.
The watermark is worth noting: its presence on a low-denomination sales receipt reflects an anti-counterfeiting concern that seems disproportionate to the face value, but tax fraud through receipt forgery was a documented problem for state revenue departments.