Danh mục
| Đơn vị phát hành | Uncertain Germanic tribes |
|---|---|
| Năm | 175-275 |
| Loại | Standard circulation coin |
| Mệnh giá | |
| Tiền tệ | Aureus (circa 150-325) |
| Chất liệu | Bronze |
| Trọng lượng | 11.95 g |
| Đường kính | 23 mm |
| Độ dày | |
| Hình dạng | Round (irregular) |
| Kỹ thuật | Hammered |
| Hướng | |
| Nghệ nhân khắc | |
| Lưu hành đến | |
| Tài liệu tham khảo |
| Mô tả mặt trước | Radiate bust facing right surrounded by legend. |
|---|---|
| Chữ viết mặt trước | Latin |
| Chữ khắc mặt trước | ANTONINV - AVG PPTRII |
| Mô tả mặt sau | Person standing with arms extended, all surrounded by legend. |
| Chữ viết mặt sau | Latin |
| Chữ khắc mặt sau | SS - SSO |
| Cạnh | Smooth. |
| Xưởng đúc | |
| Số lượng đúc |
ND (175-275) - Imitating Rome mint - |
| ID Numisquare | 6439086560 |
| Thông tin bổ sung |
Historical Context: This bronze imitation, struck by uncertain Germanic tribes (175-275 AD), reflects complex interactions between Rome and its northern neighbors. Though imitating Antoninus Pius (138-161 AD), its production post-dates his reign, coinciding with intense instability like the Marcomannic Wars. These imitations filled a void in local currency, demonstrating Roman coinage's pervasive influence and prestige even among hostile peoples, who adopted imperial imagery for their own trade.
Artistry: The artistry departs significantly from official Roman minting standards. Lacking Rome's sophisticated engravers, local Germanic artisans produced dies with a highly stylized, often abstract interpretation of the imperial prototype. The portrait, intended for Antoninus Pius, likely exhibits simplified features, possibly exaggerated or more linear. Reverse designs, if present, would similarly show reduced detail and emphasize symbolic representation over classical realism, characteristic of a "barbaric" stylistic school prioritizing recognition.
Technical/Grading: This 11.95 gram, 23 mm bronze coin typically exhibits characteristics of unofficial issues. Flans are often irregular, and strikes frequently off-center or weak, especially on high points of the portrait (hair, nose, ear) and any reverse figures. Legends, if attempted, are usually garbled or illegible, distinguishing it from Roman prototypes. The overall fabric is often coarser, with potential metal porosity, reflecting less refined metallurgical and striking techniques than official Roman imperial mints, thus impacting its grade and preservation.