カタログ
| 発行体 | Uncertain Germanic tribes |
|---|---|
| 年号 | 175-275 |
| 種類 | Standard circulation coin |
| 額面 | |
| 通貨 | Aureus (circa 150-325) |
| 材質 | Bronze |
| 重量 | 11.95 g |
| 直径 | 23 mm |
| 厚さ | |
| 形状 | Round (irregular) |
| 製造技法 | Hammered |
| 向き | |
| 彫刻師 | |
| 流通終了年 | |
| 参考文献 |
| 表面の説明 | Radiate bust facing right surrounded by legend. |
|---|---|
| 表面の文字体系 | Latin |
| 表面の銘文 | ANTONINV - AVG PPTRII |
| 裏面の説明 | Person standing with arms extended, all surrounded by legend. |
| 裏面の文字体系 | Latin |
| 裏面の銘文 | SS - SSO |
| 縁 | Smooth. |
| 鋳造所 | |
| 鋳造数 |
ND (175-275) - Imitating Rome mint - |
| Numisquare ID | 6439086560 |
| 追加情報 |
Historical Context: This bronze imitation, struck by uncertain Germanic tribes (175-275 AD), reflects complex interactions between Rome and its northern neighbors. Though imitating Antoninus Pius (138-161 AD), its production post-dates his reign, coinciding with intense instability like the Marcomannic Wars. These imitations filled a void in local currency, demonstrating Roman coinage's pervasive influence and prestige even among hostile peoples, who adopted imperial imagery for their own trade.
Artistry: The artistry departs significantly from official Roman minting standards. Lacking Rome's sophisticated engravers, local Germanic artisans produced dies with a highly stylized, often abstract interpretation of the imperial prototype. The portrait, intended for Antoninus Pius, likely exhibits simplified features, possibly exaggerated or more linear. Reverse designs, if present, would similarly show reduced detail and emphasize symbolic representation over classical realism, characteristic of a "barbaric" stylistic school prioritizing recognition.
Technical/Grading: This 11.95 gram, 23 mm bronze coin typically exhibits characteristics of unofficial issues. Flans are often irregular, and strikes frequently off-center or weak, especially on high points of the portrait (hair, nose, ear) and any reverse figures. Legends, if attempted, are usually garbled or illegible, distinguishing it from Roman prototypes. The overall fabric is often coarser, with potential metal porosity, reflecting less refined metallurgical and striking techniques than official Roman imperial mints, thus impacting its grade and preservation.