کاتالوگ
| صادرکننده | Uncertain Germanic tribes |
|---|---|
| سال | 175-275 |
| نوع | Standard circulation coin |
| ارزش | |
| واحد پول | Aureus (circa 150-325) |
| ترکیب | Bronze |
| وزن | 11.95 g |
| قطر | 23 mm |
| ضخامت | |
| شکل | Round (irregular) |
| تکنیک | Hammered |
| جهت | |
| حکاک(ها) | |
| در گردش تا | |
| مرجع(ها) |
| توضیحات روی سکه | Radiate bust facing right surrounded by legend. |
|---|---|
| خط روی سکه | Latin |
| نوشتههای روی سکه | ANTONINV - AVG PPTRII |
| توضیحات پشت سکه | Person standing with arms extended, all surrounded by legend. |
| خط پشت سکه | Latin |
| نوشتههای پشت سکه | SS - SSO |
| لبه | Smooth. |
| ضرابخانه | |
| تیراژ ضرب |
ND (175-275) - Imitating Rome mint - |
| شناسه Numisquare | 6439086560 |
| اطلاعات تکمیلی |
Historical Context: This bronze imitation, struck by uncertain Germanic tribes (175-275 AD), reflects complex interactions between Rome and its northern neighbors. Though imitating Antoninus Pius (138-161 AD), its production post-dates his reign, coinciding with intense instability like the Marcomannic Wars. These imitations filled a void in local currency, demonstrating Roman coinage's pervasive influence and prestige even among hostile peoples, who adopted imperial imagery for their own trade.
Artistry: The artistry departs significantly from official Roman minting standards. Lacking Rome's sophisticated engravers, local Germanic artisans produced dies with a highly stylized, often abstract interpretation of the imperial prototype. The portrait, intended for Antoninus Pius, likely exhibits simplified features, possibly exaggerated or more linear. Reverse designs, if present, would similarly show reduced detail and emphasize symbolic representation over classical realism, characteristic of a "barbaric" stylistic school prioritizing recognition.
Technical/Grading: This 11.95 gram, 23 mm bronze coin typically exhibits characteristics of unofficial issues. Flans are often irregular, and strikes frequently off-center or weak, especially on high points of the portrait (hair, nose, ear) and any reverse figures. Legends, if attempted, are usually garbled or illegible, distinguishing it from Roman prototypes. The overall fabric is often coarser, with potential metal porosity, reflecting less refined metallurgical and striking techniques than official Roman imperial mints, thus impacting its grade and preservation.