Volledige afbeeldingen bekijken — gratis registratie
Doorgaan met Google — het is gratis of registreer met e-mail

Waarom registreren? Alleen om bots buiten ons catalogus te houden. Uw e-mail blijft privé — we delen het nooit en sturen u niets zonder uw toestemming. Dat garanderen wij u!

Timsha - Pradip Shah

Uitgever Princely state of Garhwal (Indian princely states)
Jaar 1717-1772
Type Log in om details te zien
Waarde 1 Timsha
Valuta Log in om details te zien
Samenstelling Log in om details te zien
Gewicht Log in om details te zien
Diameter Log in om details te zien
Dikte Log in om details te zien
Vorm Log in om details te zien
Techniek Log in om details te zien
Oriëntatie Log in om details te zien
Graveur(s) Log in om details te zien
In omloop tot Log in om details te zien
Referentie(s) Log in om details te zien
Beschrijving voorzijde Log in om details te zien
Schrift voorzijde Arabic
Opschrift voorzijde Log in om details te zien
Beschrijving keerzijde Hammered silver flan with a Persian legend in bold, somewhat crude naskh script reading 'Badshah Ghazi' across the central field, continuing the Mughal imperial formula from the obverse. The field shows the typical uneven surface and hammer flow lines associated with hand-struck Garhwali coinage. Partial annular border elements are visible near the rim on some areas. The overall style is consistent with the provincial hill-mint tradition of the 18th century.
Schrift keerzijde Log in om details te zien
Opschrift keerzijde Log in om details te zien
Rand Log in om details te zien
Muntplaats Log in om details te zien
Oplage Log in om details te zien
Aanvullende informatie

Garhwal's coinage from this period occupies an awkward historical position: the kingdom had nominally acknowledged Mughal suzerainty since the early seventeenth century, yet its rulers maintained enough practical independence to strike their own silver. The Timsha series issued under Pradip Shah reflects that ambiguity — local authority expressed through coin while imperial structures slowly decayed around it.

The "cf." designation against KM#3 suggests this piece deviates from the catalogued type in some respect not fully resolved by the standard reference, likely a die variation or legend spelling the specialists haven't formally classified.

MISSCHIEN OOK INTERESSANT