Catalogus
Waarom registreren? Alleen om bots buiten ons catalogus te houden. Uw e-mail blijft privé — we delen het nooit en sturen u niets zonder uw toestemming. Dat garanderen wij u!
| Uitgever | Dacians of Transylvania |
|---|---|
| Jaar | 300 BC - 201 BC |
| Type | Log in om details te zien |
| Waarde | Tetradrachm (4) |
| Valuta | Log in om details te zien |
| Samenstelling | Log in om details te zien |
| Gewicht | Log in om details te zien |
| Diameter | Log in om details te zien |
| Dikte | Log in om details te zien |
| Vorm | Log in om details te zien |
| Techniek | Log in om details te zien |
| Oriëntatie | Log in om details te zien |
| Graveur(s) | Log in om details te zien |
| In omloop tot | Log in om details te zien |
| Referentie(s) | Log in om details te zien |
| Beschrijving voorzijde | Log in om details te zien |
|---|---|
| Schrift voorzijde | Log in om details te zien |
| Opschrift voorzijde | Log in om details te zien |
| Beschrijving keerzijde | Reverse depicts a schematized horse in a prancing or galloping posture facing left, rendered in a bold, abstracted style typical of Dacian imitations of Macedonian coinage. The horse's hindquarters are prominently modeled in high relief with an exaggerated rounded rump, while the forelegs and head are rendered in a simplified, almost geometric fashion. A large globule occupies the upper left field, and fragmentary linear elements — vestigial remains of the rider or chariot motif from the Macedonian prototype — appear in the upper and lower field. The flan is irregular with a slightly uneven surface, and no inscription or legend is present, consistent with the aniconic Dacian coinage tradition. |
| Schrift keerzijde | Log in om details te zien |
| Opschrift keerzijde | Log in om details te zien |
| Rand | Plain |
| Muntplaats | Log in om details te zien |
| Oplage | Log in om details te zien |
| Aanvullende informatie |
The Wangenschnecke ("cheek-spiral") type belongs to a cluster of Dacian imitative coinage derived ultimately from Macedonian tetradrachms of Philip II, filtered through successive local copying that progressively abstracted the original designs into near-unrecognizable geometric forms. Each generation of die-cutting moved further from the prototype, making the sequence a rare case where deliberate stylization — not degradation — appears to have been the goal. These coins circulated within a tribal economy that had no mint infrastructure in any administrative sense; dies were cut by craftsmen whose relationship to the original coinage was almost entirely visual rather than monetary.