查看完整图片 — 免费注册
使用Google继续 — 免费 或用邮箱注册

为什么需要注册?只是为了防止机器人访问我们的目录。您的邮箱完全保密——我们绝不会分享或在未经您许可的情况下发送任何内容。我们向您保证!

Tetradrachm Uncertain Punic mint, Lilybaion or Entella

发行方 Uncertain Punic mint
年份 320 BC - 300 BC
类型 登录 以查看详情
面值 登录 以查看详情
货币 登录 以查看详情
材质 登录 以查看详情
重量 登录 以查看详情
直径 登录 以查看详情
厚度 登录 以查看详情
形状 登录 以查看详情
制作工艺 Hammered
方向 登录 以查看详情
雕刻师 登录 以查看详情
流通至 登录 以查看详情
参考资料 登录 以查看详情
正面描述 登录 以查看详情
正面文字 登录 以查看详情
正面铭文 登录 以查看详情
背面描述 Head of a horse facing right, depicted with finely engraved mane falling in a long, stylized curve along the neck. The animal's bridle and forelock are carefully detailed. To the right stands a palm tree with a slender trunk and spreading fronds, a well-known Punic symbol of Carthage. The Punic inscription appears in the exergue below the horse's neck, and the overall composition closely follows Carthaginian coinage conventions of the period.
背面文字 登录 以查看详情
背面铭文 עמ מחנת
边缘 登录 以查看详情
铸币厂 登录 以查看详情
铸造量 登录 以查看详情
附加信息

The attribution to either Lilybaion or Entella reflects a longstanding editorial problem in Punic Sicilian numismatics — the two mints operated under similar Carthaginian administrative control during the late fourth century, used overlapping die cutters, and produced coins for the same military payroll economy. Jenkins's grouping acknowledges the uncertainty rather than forcing a false precision. Carthage was aggressively funding mercenary operations across Sicily at this moment, and tetradrachms of this weight standard were the primary instrument for paying Greek and Campanian soldiers who would accept nothing less.

您可能也会喜欢