目录
为什么需要注册?只是为了防止机器人访问我们的目录。您的邮箱完全保密——我们绝不会分享或在未经您许可的情况下发送任何内容。我们向您保证!
| 正面描述 | 登录 以查看详情 |
|---|---|
| 正面文字 | 登录 以查看详情 |
| 正面铭文 | 登录 以查看详情 |
| 背面描述 | Stylised standing figure of Herakles facing left, derived from the Thasian tetradrachm type but rendered in pronounced Celtic abstraction, the body reduced to geometric forms. The club, held in the right hand, is degenerated into a cluster of pellets, and the Nemean lion's skin draped over the left arm is similarly schematised. The reverse legend, executed in debased pseudo-Greek characters imitating the Thasian ΘΑΣΙΩΝ inscription, reads IΩVΛEO to the right of the figure, ΩZHDOΛ to the left, and Λ•ΣIΩM below; an additional M appears in the inner left field. |
| 背面文字 | 登录 以查看详情 |
| 背面铭文 | IΩVΛEO ΩZHDOΛ Λ•ΣIΩM |
| 边缘 | 登录 以查看详情 |
| 铸币厂 | 登录 以查看详情 |
| 铸造量 | 登录 以查看详情 |
| 附加信息 |
The Thasian tetradrachm became the template of choice for Celtic tribes across Thrace and the middle Danube basin after the original Thasian issues — themselves a revival of an earlier series — flooded the region through trade and mercenary payments. Celtic die-cutters didn't simply copy; they progressively abstracted the prototype across generations of imitation, each workshop drifting further from the source. By the late second century BC, the design had undergone such radical stylization that the connection to Thasos is recognizable only to a trained eye.
Attribution to a specific tribe remains contested. The Göbl class III placement narrows the typological lineage but stops short of a firm tribal assignment.