Catalogus
Waarom registreren? Alleen om bots buiten ons catalogus te houden. Uw e-mail blijft privé — we delen het nooit en sturen u niets zonder uw toestemming. Dat garanderen wij u!
| Uitgever | Uncertain Punic mint |
|---|---|
| Jaar | 320 BC - 310 BC |
| Type | Log in om details te zien |
| Waarde | Log in om details te zien |
| Valuta | Litra |
| Samenstelling | Log in om details te zien |
| Gewicht | Log in om details te zien |
| Diameter | Log in om details te zien |
| Dikte | Log in om details te zien |
| Vorm | Log in om details te zien |
| Techniek | Log in om details te zien |
| Oriëntatie | Log in om details te zien |
| Graveur(s) | Log in om details te zien |
| In omloop tot | Log in om details te zien |
| Referentie(s) | Log in om details te zien |
| Beschrijving voorzijde | Log in om details te zien |
|---|---|
| Schrift voorzijde | Log in om details te zien |
| Opschrift voorzijde | Log in om details te zien |
| Beschrijving keerzijde | A powerfully rendered lion strides to the left in the exergual field, its head turned to face the viewer frontally, conveying strength and authority in a characteristic Punic artistic convention. Behind the lion rises a tall date palm tree, a prominent Phoenician and Carthaginian symbol, depicted with a full canopy of fronds and hanging clusters of fruit. In the lower exergue, a Punic inscription in Neo-Punic script reads, translating as 'People of the camp,' referencing the military mint context of the issue. The overall composition is bold and well-centred within an irregular flan, with a beaded or dotted border partially visible around the circumference. |
| Schrift keerzijde | Log in om details te zien |
| Opschrift keerzijde | Log in om details te zien |
| Rand | Plain |
| Muntplaats | Log in om details te zien |
| Oplage | Log in om details te zien |
| Aanvullende informatie |
These tetradrachms are associated with the Punic military coinage struck to pay mercenary forces during Carthage's intensive campaigns in Sicily — a theater of near-constant warfare against Syracuse throughout the late fourth century. The mint itself remains unlocalized; whether it operated in North Africa or in Sicily closer to the armies it served is a question the numismatic record has not settled. Kraay and Hirmer's attribution acknowledges the uncertainty without resolving it.
The Attic weight standard adopted here was a deliberate choice, making the coins directly commensurable with the Greek mercenary pay already circulating on Sicily.